<
Michael Lawson Neff, P.C. | Atlanta Personal Injury Lawyers
PRACTICE AREAS
Michael Lawson Neff | Personal Injury Lawyer, Atlanta
Blog
Atlanta, Georgia Personal Injury Lawyer



Atlanta personal injury lawyer blog Wednesday, February 10, 2010

  Street Racing Behind Stone Mountain Girl's Death

I previously wrote before about the death of Tanesha Williams, the Stone Mountain High School student who was killed when another teen apparently lost control of his vehicle and jumped the curb. Now, it seems, two seventeen year old boys are being held accountable in this tragic accident.

The two boys, Saheed Saunders and Tomcum Siripanhya, are both being charged with racing, reckless driving and vehicular homicide. In addition to that, Saunders is accused of improper passing. It was this improper passing which caused his car to leave the road near Stone Mountain High School - which it did just shortly after classes had been dismissed. Saunders' car struck three Stone Mountain High School students, killing Tanesha Williams and injuring the other two.

The boys were released from jail late last month, Saunders on bond of $21,000, and Siripanhya on bond of $20,000.

At the time of the boys' release, DeKalb County police were still investigating the case in cooperation with the DeKalb County District Attorney's Office.

It saddened me to learn that the death of a fourteen year old girl was caused by something as reckless and preventable as street racing. Drivers of whatever age carry the responsibility to think not only of their own safety, but the safety of their passengers, of other motorists and of pedestrians. Driving is a privilege which many of us enjoy and even rely on for maintaining both our professional and personal lives.

In the case of seventeen year olds, it is still a new privilege, and one which is easy not to fully appreciate. Street racing is among numerous other dangerous driving habits which are significantly more common among teens and other younger drivers, along with driving while distracted by cell phones or texting, and driving while intoxicated. Of these three behaviors, street racing could be considered among the safest statistically. Fewer accidents are caused every year by racing than by distracted or intoxicated driving.

However, that statement ignores the obvious danger presented by street racing. Over the past few years, a wide variety of different news programs and media outlets have showcased the dangers of street racing through interviews and articles, and it is not hard to find other stories of how irresponsible, illegal street racing leads to the death of either the drivers, or other motorists or passersby whose only mistake was being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Street racing is, by its nature, dangerous. Whenever drivers choose to ignore the basic rules of the road in favor of their own "fun" or convenience, they put themselves and others at risk. Hopefully this incident will serve as a lesson for Saunders and Siripanhya, and other teens in the area. It is tragic that a young girl had to die for it.

If you or someone you love has been injured by a reckless or distracted driver, it is important to talk with an experienced Georgia car accident lawyer immediately. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule your free consultation.

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Wednesday, February 3, 2010

  Elderly Mobility Scooter Driver Dies after Accident

A recent upswing in the use of scooters, motorized wheelchairs and other mobility devices has allowed those with diminished mobility - such as the elderly - to move about more freely than they have in the past. There is no doubt that the access to this technology, both through improvements in the mobility devices themselves and by way of greater availability, has improved the lives of many people who would otherwise find themselves with little or no ability to get around. These devices offer those who use them an increased degree of independence.

However, they also present challenges. As a society, it seems that we are still adjusting to this increased presence, and as such there are sometimes insufficient laws in place to protect scooter drivers, motorists and pedestrians in incidents where mobility scooters are a factor.

Franklin Flynn, a seventy-one year old Marietta man, died last week after an moving vehicle accident when his electric mobility scooter was struck by a sports utility vehicle.

Flynn was riding his electric scooter, a Hoveround, south in a northbound lane of traffic when he was struck by a Chevrolet Tahoe turning south out of a parking lot, according to police. Flynn was taken to Wellstar Kennestone Hospital, where he died several days later. The driver of the Tahoe was not charged in the accident.

In incidents like this, the course of action that law enforcement should take is sometimes unclear, due in part to the nature of mobility scooters. The exact safety and etiquette for scooters and scooter/driver interaction is often poorly defined. Are scooters treated like pedestrians? Cyclists? Are there explicit rules to govern their use on sidewalks? On streets? These questions are frustrating as well as relevant.

In the UK, the question has been taken a step farther to wonder if people who drive mobility scooters ought to receive training for them. After a spate of accidents involving elderly drivers on scooters injuring or, as in the case of a ninety year old who was struck while in a crosswalk, even killing others on the road, the Norfolk, Virginia Police began offering a voluntary training class for scooter drivers.

"We have listened to the issues and concerns of the public and, with the help of our partners, have developed a mobility scooter awareness course that enhances the users’ ability to use their scooter in a safe and appropriate manner," said a spokesman for the Norfolk Police.

While this seems like a sound start, and perhaps we can eventually see some sort of training programs in place stateside, it also seems to sidestep the other half of this equation. Safer driving on the part of scooters can hardly be a bad idea, but what about the drivers and pedestrians that they share the pavement with? Learning and understanding how mobility scooters and those around them can most safely coexist will, without a doubt, become a priority in years to come, and hopefully one day will lead to fewer accidents like that which killed Franklin Flynn.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,


Wednesday, January 27, 2010

  Student Killed When Young Driver Loses Control

Tanesha Leshay Williams was a quiet, reserved fourteen year old. The freshman at Stone Mountain High School did not have many friends, but those who did know her describe a person who was kind, caring and worth knowing once she opened up. Williams' father, Anwar Bass, speaks of a girl who wanted to help people - a girl who spoke of being a nurse or a message therapist or a teacher when she grew up. According to Bass, the job she looked forward to in the future changed often, but the goal of helping others stayed the same.

“Let me know when you get to 12th grade,” Bass said he told her.

Unfortunately, Bass will not have the opportunity to see just what path his daughter would have chosen for herself in the end. Tanesha Leshay Williams died when a green Crown Victoria left the road and struck her while she was walking between her high school and her mother's home. The car also hit two other students, one male and one female, leaving them with nonfatal injuries. The seventeen year old driver of the Crown Victoria - who may or may not have been one of Williams' fellow students - also suffered some minor injuries as the result of losing control of the car.

Williams was rushed to hospital, but as far as her father is concerned, she died on the scene of the accident.

“It knocked the last wind out of her,” he said.

Alexandra Stamper, also fourteen and one of Williams few friends, talked with AJC after the incident. Stamper explained how she and the other girl had been friends since they met in middle school.

“I was the only person she would talk to,” Stamper said, then continued, “She was a very cool person when you got to know her.”

“I think she didn’t really feel that good about herself. She looked up to me. I would encourage her whenever I saw her to hold her head up because she was always walking like she was sad,” Stamper said explained.

Stamper left a teddy bear at the memorial students had built for Williams. While Williams was not well known, the fact that one of their schoolmates has died did not leave other Stone Mountain students unmoved. The fact has left many of the students shaken and aware of the dangers of losing control of a car.

“I just think people just gotta control their cars and know where they are going,” said Tyrelle Harrison, a seventeen year old junior at Stone Mountain.

Harrison walks to school every day, and on the day after Williams death, found himself walking on the opposite side of the road as he thought of what had happened.

Grief counselors have been made available to Stone Mountain High School students.

If you or someone you love has been injured by a driver, it is important to talk with an experienced Georgia car accident lawyer immediately. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule your free consultation.

Labels: , , , ,


Wednesday, December 30, 2009

  Tire Blowout Kills Two on I-20 in Atlanta

Two people were killed last week and an additional four were injured in a single car accident. The accident temporarily closed I-20 eastbound lanes.

The accident was caused when a tire on the vehicle, a 2003 Ford Explorer, blew out and caused it to flip several times. Three of the Explorers six passengers were thrown out of the vehicle entirely.

Adriana Gil, twenty-nine, and Rocia Jimenez, also twenty-nine, both died in the accident. Both young women were from Forest Park. The other four victims were rushed to receive medical attention; their identities have not been released.

Tire blowouts are not uncommon, and can lead to very dangerous accidents, as demonstrated before on this blog when I wrote about the infamous Firestone Tire Recall. A rapid loss of air pressure in the tire – in that case due to tread separation – can easily lead to a total loss of control or a rollover when driving at speed.

How can you avoid a tire blowout or a rollover?

Unfortunately, there is no sure fire way to avoid either. Even safe drivers who properly maintain their tires can find themselves in a circumstance where one of their tires blows as a result of debris in the road, a pothole or in some cases, defective tires. There are, however, things you as a driver can do to minimize your chances of a serious blowout or rollover, and to protect yourself if the worst comes to pass.

First, check your tires regularly to insure that they have proper traction and are properly inflated. Properly maintaining your tires will help prevent a blowout in the first place.

Do not immediately hit the breaks if one of your tires loses pressure. If possible, maintain your speed until the car stabilizes – this will help your car’s traction. Only after the car stabilizes should you slow down and pull over to the side of the road.

Most rollovers occur on rural roads and highways, so exercise particular caution on these roads. Keeping two hands on the wheel and staying alert will help you avoid obstacles which could potentially cause a blowout or rollover, and ensures that you will be more likely to respond appropriately if something does go wrong.

Secure heavy cargo inside your car tightly, so it will not transform into a projectile in the event of a rollover.

And, of course, avoid driving at excessive speed.

The most common reason why people lose control of their cars is because they are under the influence of drugs or alcohol, they are tired, or they are otherwise distracted by talking on their cell phones or sending text messages. I’ve mentioned the perils of distracted driving on this blog many times, but, of course, distracted driving will always be one of our major problems on the road.

In the event the worst come to pass, remember that you should always be wearing your safety belt. Passengers wearing seatbelts are significantly more likely to survive a rollover crash than those who are unbelted.

If you or a loved one has been injured in a car accident, contact an experienced Georgia accident lawyer as soon as possible to protect your rights. For legal advice, call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: , , , ,


Tuesday, December 8, 2009

  Atlanta Wrong Way Driver Causes Fatal Car Wreck

Imagine traveling on I-75 in downtown Atlanta and seeing a pair of headlights speeding toward you in the opposite direction. That’s what happened to Jasmin Zachery, 25, early this morning. A student at Gallaudet University in Washington, DC, she was on her way home from a friend’s house when a wrong-way driver crashed into her car.

Police say that the wrong way driver, Theus Monroe, 26, was going north on I-75 southbound and traveling at a high speed when he collided head-on with another car. Both drivers were trapped in their vehicles and had to be rescued. Zachery died in the accident.

The accident occurred near Langford Parkway. Police closed all southbound connector lanes to investigate the scene and clear the wreckage. The interstate reopened at 5:30 a.m. this morning.

Monroe is in critical condition at Grady Hospital. He was arrested for reckless driving, serious injury by vehicle, and driving the wrong way. At this point, there are no reports on whether or not Monroe was intoxicated. According to CBS Atlanta, it was his birthday. As you can imagine, most wrong way drivers are intoxicated.

Sadly, this is not the only recent traffic fatality caused by a wrong way driver in Atlanta. Last month an Atlanta drunk driver going the wrong way on I-20 killed a mother of two. The suspect, Robert Ayiteyfio, was driving west on the eastbound lanes of I-20 when his Camry collided with a Ford Taurus driven by Shameyka Welch, 24, who died at Grady Hospital. Ayiteyfio fled on foot but was caught by police. He was charged with DUI, homicide by vehicle, and driving the wrong way. He was taken to Fulton County Jail. Last week the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that Ayiteyfio’s preliminary hearing has been delayed.

Back in June, an Atlanta drunk driver was arrested after he caused nine crashes while driving the wrong way on I-85 and the Buford connector. After the drunk driver, Richard Jernigan, caused the ninth wreck that day, a group of witnesses chased him down and held him for police. Witness Brian Shields said, “I guess the adrenalin . . . I was not going to let him get away because he hurt that lady and almost hurt us. (He) could’ve hurt many more people.” Luckily, there were no fatalities in this case. One woman was seriously injured but expected to fully recover.

As we enter the holiday season, more drunk drivers will be on the roads of Atlanta. Be vigilant and drive defensively. You’d probably never expect to see a wrong-way driver headed toward you on an Atlanta interstate, but as these reports show, it’s a distinct possibility. Be prepared and keep your eyes on the road at all times.

If you or a loved one has been seriously injured by a drunk driver or reckless driver, contact an Atlanta car wreck lawyer as soon as possible. You may be entitled to compensation. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule your free consultation.

Labels:


Wednesday, October 7, 2009

  Top 10 Non-Traffic Car Injuries

Not all car-related injuries are due to car wrecks. The causes of top car injuries may surprise you.

Forbes.com recently published a list of the Top 10 Non-Traffic Car Injuries. Continue reading for a list of the top car-related injuries plus advice and how to avoid them.

10. Radiator Burns - With an annual injury estimate of 9,000, radiator burns are not cool. The fluid in the radiator can reach 240 degrees Fahrenheit, and it can bubble up and explode when under pressure. If your car overheats, be careful when removing the antifreeze knob. Let the radiator cool down first. Then use gloves or a protective cloth and turn the knob slowly to gradually relieve pressure.

9. Flying Objects - With an annual injury estimate of 20,000, flying object injuries typically occur because of cargo inside the car. Laptops, coolers, books, pets, groceries, and other cargo items can become dangerous objects when the vehicles suddenly stop. Use storage bins, cargo racks, hooks, fasteners, and similar devices to secure cargo when moving.

8. Falling from Vehicle - With an annual injury estimate of 28,000, falling from a vehicle ties with falling against a vehicle for the number eight spot. Children should not ride in the backs of pickup trucks or moving trucks, nor should children sit next to fully opened windows. Use those child safety window locks; they’re there for a reason.

7. Injured by Door - With an annual injury estimate of 36,000, car door injuries can be very painful. The elderly, disabled, and children are more susceptible to getting injured by automobile doors. Help them get in and out of vehicles.

6. Strains and Sprains - With an annual injury estimate of 44,000, strains and sprains typically occur when people are getting out of vehicles. Cars that sit low to the ground and vehicles that sit high above the ground are more likely to be involved in strain and sprain injuries. Warn your passengers to watch their step if the step is uncommonly low or high.

5. Cuts - With an annual injury estimate of 68,000, cuts commonly occur from sharp metal in older vehicles. Repair any jagged edges and keep your vehicle properly maintained and cleaned to prevent cuts.

4. Hit by Car - In non-traffic situations, approximately 74,000 people get hit by a car and injured each year. Watch out for blind spots, especially in shorter and taller vehicles. Be sure to turn around and look for children (and animals) before backing up. Most victims of victims of back-up injuries are children.

3. Falling - With 84,000 estimated injuries, falling while getting into or out of vehicles is a big problem. When combined with similar injuries like strains and sprains, the act of entering or exiting a vehicle is the largest cause of non-traffic-related injuries in the country. Watch your step!

2. Overexertion - Really? Car-related overexertion is estimated to cause 88,000 injuries annually. Most overexertion injuries stem from people unloading vehicles or trying to push immobile vehicles. Ask for help when lifting or pushing heavy objects. If your car is stuck, call a tow truck or a friend. There’s no need to risk injury.

1. Body Part Slammed in Door - With an annual injury estimate of 148,000, injuries caused by closing a car door. Car doors can weigh up to 200 pounds and easily break a finger or hand.

Remember, your car can be dangerous even when it’s not moving! Of course, car wrecks are the most common cause of car injuries. If you’ve been seriously injured in a car wreck that was someone else’s fault, contact an experienced Georgia personal injury attorney as soon as possible. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: , ,


Monday, September 28, 2009

  Jury Awards $24 Million to Car Wreck Injury Victim

Last week Chicago’s Daily Herald reported that a Cook County jury awarded $23.8 million to a man who was disabled in a 2004 car wreck. The jury award is reportedly the largest to a paraplegic in Cook County history.

Andrzej Chraca, 38, received the award after a two-week trial on his 2004 automobile collision with Steve Miles, an Illinois Department of Transportation employee. Mile’s IDOT truck struck Chraca’s SUV in the accident.

During the trial, both drivers insisted that they had a green light, and police could not determine which driver was at fault. Six eyewitnesses gave conflicting testimony. The jury found for Chrace, apparently because his car was struck by Miles’ vehicle.

Chraca’s attorney Martin Healy, Jr., said, “You have to separate the case into liability and damages. Once they determined he was not the one who was primarily responsible for it and the were going to find for him, then you look at damages. The large verdict is justified by the injuries that were incurred, terrible injuries. He is going to suffer every day of his life.”

Both Chraca and Miles sustained back fractures and partial paralysis. Chraca is now a paraplegic. The wreck fractured a vertebra in his spine. He cannot walk without leg braces and a walker, and he typically uses a wheelchair. Neither Chraca nor Miles has returned to work since the accident.

“After five years, that’s what came over me, that I was vindicated,” Chraca said. He added that the monetary judgment would not make up for his permanent disability.

The jury award was initially more than $25 million, but the jury found that Chraca was 5 percent negligent and responsible for the accident because he was driving over the speed limit. This reduced his total award to $23.8 million. However, his attorney is not sure if Chraca will be able to collect the full amount: “There are limitations, and I’ll be honest with you, it’s going to be subject to other litigation.”

The Illinois Department of Transportation, Miles’ employer, will be responsible for $2 million in the judgment; this amount will be covered by insurance. Natalie Bauer, spokesperson for the Illinois Attorney General’s Office, said, “We’re reviewing the judgment at this point and considering post-trial motions.”

Spine injuries like the one sustained by Chraca often result in partial or complete paralysis, and recovery can be a long, difficult process.

If you are ever injured in a automobile accident, call 911 immediately. Do not discuss the accident until police arrive. Never admit fault. Collect contact information from witnesses, and take photos if possible. If you don’t have a cell phone camera, buy a disposable camera. Evidence may be lost if you don’t take photos immediately. See a doctor as soon as possible and make sure that your injuries are documented. Contact a personal injury attorney as soon as possible, too. The faster you act, the better your case will be. If you have questions about your legal rights, contact Georgia accident lawyer Michael Neff to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: , ,


Tuesday, July 28, 2009

  DOT Covered Up Research on Cell Phone Use While Driving

I see them every morning on the way to work: “multi-tasking drivers” - drivers who are talking on their cell phone, watching their GPS system, and eating breakfast all at the same time. It’s scary. And it’s disappointing to learn that government officials covered up research about the risks of cell phone use while driving.


Last week The New York Times reported that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) withheld hundreds of pages of research about the dangers of cell phone use while driving. According Matt Richtel, former head of the NHTSA, officials at the Department of Transportation (DOT) urged the agency to withhold the research to avoid antagonizing the Congressional appropriators who controlled the highway budget. These appropriators had made it clear that they wanted the NHTSA to gather safety data but not to “lobby” the states. As a result of the DOT’s urging, the research was never released, and plans for a large-scale study were never presented.

The 2003 research was finally released last week through the Freedom of Information Act. The following comes from a 2003 draft letter that was never sent:

As you know, the wireless communications industry has grown at an extraordinary rate. Today there are more than 147 million cell phone subscribers - more than half of the U.S. population. According to a survey by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 6% of daylight driving time - up from 4% in 2000 - involves talking onthe phone. That translates into more than 200 million in-car calls per day. However, the primary responsibility of the driver has always been to operate a motor vehicle safely. It is a task that requires full attention and focus. Statistics show that all distractions, whether associated with the use of technology or not, can increase the risk of a crash.

NHTSA estimates that driver distraction contributes to about 25 percent of all traffic crashes. Though all distractions are a concern, we have seen the growth of a particulardistraction, namely cell phone use while driving. While the precise impact cannot bequantified, we nevertheless have concluded that the use of cell phones while driving has contributed to an increasing number of crashes, injuries and fatalities. A significant body of research worldwide indicates that both hand-held and hands-free cell phones increase the risk of a crash. Indeed, research has demonstrated that there is little, if any, difference between the use of hand-held and hands-free phones in contributing to the risk of driving while distracted. In either operational mode, we have found that the cognitive distraction is significant enough to degrade a drivers’ performance.

We recommend that drivers not use these devices when driving, except in an emergency. Moreover, we are convinced that legislation forbidding the use of handheld cell phones while driving will not be effective since it will not address the problem. In fact, such legislation may erroneously imply that hands-free phones are safe to use while driving.

Why did it take six years for government officials to release this information? As The New York Times puts it, Since when did trying to save lives constitute lobbying?

“We’re looking at a problem that could be as bad as drunk driving, and the government has covered it up,” said Clarence Ditlow, director of the Center for Auto Safety.

Studies in recent years have shown that a driver talking on a cell phone is four times more likely to crash; furthermore, a driver who’s talking on a cell phone is comparable to a drunk driver with a 0.08 blood alcohol content.

Texting and talking while driving is standard behavior. Today, in 2009, the DOT estimates that roughly 12 percent of drivers are on the phone at any given time. That number has doubled since 2003. Perhaps, if the 2003 research was not withheld, a few more lives could have been saved.

Have you been injured in a car wreck because of a distracted driver? If so, call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule your free consultation.

Labels: , ,


Wednesday, July 22, 2009

  Chiari Malformation After Car Accident

A Chiari malformation, or Arnold-Chiari malformation, is a structural defect in the brain. Normally, the cerebellum rests in the space at the back of the skull. When the cerebellum protrudes into the foramen magnum (the opening to the spinal canal), this is called a Chiari malformation.

Most cases of Chiari malformation (CM) are thought to be caused by defective fetal development of the brain and spine. CM can also be acquired later in life because of injury, infection, poisoning, or anything that drains cerebrospinal fluid.

A Chiari malformation (CM) may cause headaches, dizziness, vision problems, insomnia, depression, or more serious conditions. For instance, CM may impede the flow of cerebrospinal fluid, causing it to build up in the brain; this is know as hydrocephalus, and it cause affect mental function as well as the shape of the skull. Many people, however, do not even know that they have a CM, as it is asymptomatic.

Auto accidents and other traumatic injuries can cause asymptomatic CM to become symptomatic. A major medical study by Dr. Thomas Milhorat, MD, found that people with asymptomatic or mild CM typically have an underdeveloped cranial cavity and a crowded hindbrain. Auto accidents and other injuries can easily exacerbate this delicate condition by pushing the cerebellum farther into the foramen magnum, causing a CM symptoms to appear.

The World Chiari Malformation Association has published several trauma testimonials in which people describe suffering from Chiari malformation after a car accident. Here are a few of the stories:

“I was at a stop sign on November 3, 1995 when I was hit head-on by another car. Since then I have had all sorts of problems. Before my accident I was very healthy, working out every day etc. Now I have Arnold Chiari Malformation. Unfortunately, I had to go through 6 neurosurgeons in order to find one that specialized in ACM. I have had six surgeries since my accident...four of which were for ACM and SM. I deal with chronic pain every day now since this accident.”

“I was diagnosed with chiari during the summer of 1986. I had few symptoms at that time, and a neurologist told me then that if the chiari ever became truly troublesome, then surgery would be an option . In December 1996 , I was a passenger in a car that was stopped to make a left turn. We were rear-ended by a car going around 50 mph , and the back of my head struck the seat/ head rest. Within several hours, my symptoms got worse and continued to worsen for several weeks. Headaches and dizzy spells became constant along with many other symptoms commonly associated with ACM. One afternoon I passed out several times in my yard while trying to get into my house. A friend drove me to a nearby hospital where I was admitted and observed for several days. After seeing several specialists and undergoing many tests, it was discovered that my tonsillar herniation (ACM), which was 5 - 8 mm before the accident, was now 8 - 12 mm. It was explained to me by a world renowned ACM expert that my tonsils had herniated further due to the head blow.”

“In 1994, I was a passenger in a car that ran a red light, hitting another car head on. I was checked out at the local ER and sent home, with mild head injury, whiplash etc. The next day I woke up sick to my stomach, my left arm was numb, and I began having severe headaches and neck pain. After 2 years of suffering with symptoms, the doctor finally sent me to a neurologist where is was determined I had partial complex seizures. I spent one week at the neurology unit of University of Penn. Medical center. The doctors there confirmed that my seizures were caused by the car accident. I continued to have other symptoms so an MRI was done, finding the ACM. I had my first decompression in March 1997. We were not aware that ACM can be started by a trauma, although our neurosurgeon did say it is very possible. Before my accident, I had went to the doctors only a few times over a seven year period. I was very healthy, never had anything wrong. After the accident, in a two year period, I had seen the doctor over 60 times.”

Suffering from a Chiari malformation after an auto accident can be a painful, frightening experience that will likely require many doctor visits and surgeries. To make matters worse, it can be difficult to prove in a court of law that Chiari malformation symptoms were caused by an auto accident.

If you suffer from a brain injury due to an auto accident or other personal injury, you need an experienced attorney who understands your condition as well as the law. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule your free consultation.

Labels: , , ,


Friday, June 19, 2009

  Would a Universal Smoking Ban in Georgia Reduce Drunk Driving Fatalities?

Smoking bans in individual cities and individual bars and restaurants are intended to save lives by reducing patrons’ exposure to second-hand smoke, but they may actually be causing more drunk driving fatalities, according to a report from ScienceDaily.

A study completed last year at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) suggests that drunk driving fatalities increase following the enactment of smoking bans. The results of this study appeared in the June 2008 issue of the Journal of Public Economics as well as the May issue of The Economist.

Researchers hypothesize that smokers are willing to drive longer distances to establishments that allow smoking. Professor Scott Adams explains, “Like they would to buy fireworks, lotto tickets or, in some cases, alcohol, people will often go to a neighboring jurisdiction that doesn’t have a ban.”

With smokers driving across town or out of town to visit establishments where smoking is allowed, the chances of them having an auto accident increase. However, Adams believes that the positive health effects of smoking bans still outweigh the negative. A preliminary study suggests that smoking bans are associated with evidence of a reduction in heart disease.

Professor Adams says that the best solution would be a universal smoking ban in public establishments. This would eliminate the risk of smokers driving long distances to avoid individual bans.

“I view economics very much as a social science – the costs associated with people’s behavior,” said Adams, who specializes in health and labor economics. “Public economists are concerned with the externalities and whether what affects you also has an impact on others – without those costs being accounted for.”

In Georgia, smoking has been banned in restaurants but not in bars.

Would a universal smoking ban in Georgia reduce the number of drunk driving fatalities? What do you think? We’d love to hear your comments.

A universal smoking ban would certainly cut down on health problems and deaths caused by second-hand smoke.

When intoxicated drivers get behind the wheel, they put many people at risk of serious injury or death. In Georgia, bars and restaurants may also be held responsible for drunk driving accidents if they serve someone who is underage or visibly intoxicated.

At MLN Law, we aggressively pursue claims against drunk drivers. If you’ve been injured by a drunk driver, or if you’ve lost a loved one because of a drunk driver, we’ll explore all options for recovery. You may be able to sue the bar, restaurant, or liquor store that served the drunk driver. You may also be able to sue the drunk driver for punitive damages as well as negligence. Punitive damages exist as a way of punishing drunk drivers for their reckless behavior.

If you or a loved one has been the victim of an irresponsible drunk driver, contact us immediately. Prompt action must be taken to investigate the accident, preserve evidence, and evaluate damages and injuries.

Call MLN Law at (404) 531-9700 to schedule your free consultation. You can call 24 hours a day. If we’re not in the office, leave a message with your contact information. When it comes to drunk driving, we will do everything in our power to punish reckless behavior and make sure you get the compensation you deserve.

Labels: , , , ,


Thursday, May 28, 2009

  Brain Injury from Whiplash

Traumatic brain injury is the leading cause of death for Americans under the age of 45. Another traumatic brain injury occurs every 15 seconds, and 5 million Americans suffer from some form of disability caused by traumatic brain injury. Anyone care to guess the leading cause of traumatic brain injury? That’s right - automobile accidents.

Brain injury from whiplash can be particularly damaging to the brain. The sudden acceleration and deceleration of auto accidents can actually twist and damage the delicate nerve fibers that make up brain tissue. These nerve fibers are called axons, and when they’re twisted, stretched, or otherwise damaged, it’s known as diffuse axonal injury.

Whiplash is the main cause of diffuse axonal injury (shaken baby syndrome is another common cause), and it normally renders the victim comatose. However, in some cases, diffuse axonal injury may only cause a brief loss of consciousness. Diffuse axonal injury may be difficult to detect or diagnose; because the damage is on a microscopic level, it’s rarely seen with imaging technologies like MRI or CT scans.

High speed car accidents may also cause another kind of brain damage known as isotropic stress. This occurs when a pressure wave moves through the brain at high speeds, damaging the internal structures of individual brain cells.

Brain damage is not always apparent at first. Some people with traumatic brain injury often feel normal and seem normal after their accident. Later, however - days, weeks, or sometimes months after the accident - the victim or a loved one will notice that something is not quite right. It may be a change in behavior, attitude, gait, vision, or speech patterns. Sometimes, the only sign of brain damage may be ringing in the ear.

Often times, victims of brain injury will not notice that anything is wrong until they return to work after the accident. Then suddenly it becomes apparent that their brain isn’t working the same. Undiagnosed brain injury can result in mistakes at work or even the loss of a job.

Unfortunately, brain injury from whiplash is often overlooked. Brain damage can be difficult to detect - and when victims suffer other serious physical injuries (as is usually the case), they’re understandably more concerned with physical pain than new quirks in personality or behavior.

Loss of consciousness and post-traumatic amnesia are signs that brain damage might have occurred. In general, the longer an accident victim is without consciousness, the more likely they’ve suffered traumatic brain injury. Post-traumatic amnesia refers to a loss of memory about events prior to the accident. In general, longer periods of amnesia indicate more severe brain injury.

If you’ve been the victim in an automobile accident - especially if you lost consciousness or experienced amnesia - then you may have suffered a traumatic brain injury. If someone else caused your accident, then they can be held liable for any damages, such as loss of employment, resulting from your brain injury. But you must act quickly! Evidence of brain injury disappears over time, as does physical evidence related to the accident. Call MLN Law at (404) 531-9700 to get the compensation you deserve.

Labels: , , , , ,


Wednesday, May 27, 2009

  Christopher Reeve Paralysis Act Signed by President Obama

In March 2009, President Obama signed the Christopher and Dana Reeve Paralysis Act, the first legislation specific to the paralysis community. The Act was part of the Omnibus Public Lands Bill and named for the late Christopher Reeve and his wife Dana, who inspired people around the world with their courage in the face of adversity.

Christopher Reeve, star of the popular Superman movies in the 1980s, became paralyzed in an equestrian accident in 1995. For the rest of his life, he lobbied for stem cell research on behalf of those with spinal cord injuries. He created the Christopher Reeve Foundation to speed up paralysis research through funding. Reeve passed away in 2004.

The Christopher and Dana Reeve Paralysis Act was introduced in the Senate by Tom Harkin (D-IA) and received bipartisan support. It will promote research, rehabilitation, and quality-of-life initiatives for the millions of Americans living with spinal cord injuries and paralysis.

Peter Wilderotter, president and CEO of the Reeve Foundation, said, “The Christopher & Dana Reeve Paralysis Act will expedite the search for cures and treatments for millions of Americans living with paralysis caused by spinal cord injury, stroke, MS, Parkinson's and many other diseases and disorders. On behalf of the Reeve Foundation, I would like to express our appreciation of Senator Harkin, who for so many years has devoted his career to others. Senator Harkin has been a wonderful friend to the Reeve family and the Reeve Foundation. People living with paralysis all over this country are celebrating today because of his dedication and commitment to the disability community.”

Wilderotter continued, "In addition to Senator Harkin's efforts, we thank Senators Thad Cochran (R-MS) and Edward Kennedy (D-MA) for initially sponsoring this important health bill. Also, I would like to express our appreciation to Chairman Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) for including the Reeve Act in the Omnibus Public Land Management Act and for his support of the paralysis community. In addition, we express our appreciation to Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) for their resolve to bring this bill before the Senate. On January 8, 2009, Congresswomen Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) introduced this Act in the House, along with her colleagues Congressmen Mary Bono Mack (R-CA), Jim Langevin (D-RI) and Gus Bilirakis (R-FL). Their extraordinary leadership and tireless efforts were instrumental in passing this historic legislation."

"Advancements are made every day in spinal cord injury research, but the Christopher and Dana Reeve Paralysis Act will speed progress and make research efforts more efficient," concluded Wilderotter.

The Act has three components which support paralysis research, rehabilitation, and quality-of-life programs:

The Paralysis Research initiative will expand research on paralysis at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and encourage collaborative research by connecting scientists conducting similar work to further enhance understanding and speed discovery of better treatments and cures. The Paralysis Rehabilitation initiative will build on research to enhance daily function for people with paralysis, including a Clinical Trials Network, to measure effectiveness of certain rehabilitation tactics and encouraging shared findings on paralysis to improve rehabilitation. The Paralysis Quality-of-Life initiative will work with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to improve the quality of life and long-term health status of persons with paralysis and other physical disabilities.

Christopher Reeve was injured in an equestrian accident, but the leading cause of paralysis, by far, is automobile accidents. Auto accidents account for 44 percent of spinal cord injuries.

If you or someone you love has been paralyzed in an accident which you believe happened due to someone else’s negligence, you may be entitled to monetary compensation. Contact Michael L. Neff at (404) 531-9700 to hold negligent parties accountable for your accident.

Labels: , , , , , ,


Monday, May 25, 2009

  Not Everyone Who Gets Hit by a Drunk Driver Dies

Jacqueline Saburido, pictured at left three years after her car was hit by a drunk driver, is living proof that not everyone who gets hit by a drunk driver dies. Some victims continue to suffer for many years.

On a Sunday morning in 1999, Jacqueline, age 20 at the time, was on her way home from a birthday party with four of her friends. Reggie Stephey, age 18 at the time, was on his way home from drinking beer. Reggie’s SUV crashed into Jacqueline’s Oldsmobile. Two of Jacqueline’s friends died at the scene. Within minutes, the Oldsmobile was engulfed in flames. Jacqueline was pinned inside. Over 60% of her body was severely burned. Nobody thought that Jacqui would live. But she did.

Jacqui lost her fingers, hair, ears, nose, left eyelid, and much of her vision. She has had more than 50 operations since the crash, and she has many more to go.

Reggie was convicted of two counts of intoxication manslaughter for the deaths of Jacqui’s two friends. He was released from prison last year after serving a full seven-year sentence.

Jacqui bravely allowed post-accident photos of herself to be used in media campaigns against drunk driving. She appeared on Oprah in 2003, and Oprah called her “a woman who defines survival.”

Amazingly, Jacqui has publicly forgiven Reggie, even though his drunk driving completely destroyed her life. Oprah said that Jacqui defines “inner beauty.” Jacqui’s story is humbling and inspiring, and it reminds us that drunk driving is a serious crime.

In 2005 alone, there were 16,885 alcohol-related traffic fatalities in the United States; that’s an average of one alcohol-related fatality every 31 minutes. In the same year, there were over 254,000 injuries from alcohol-related accidents; that’s an average of one every two minutes. In 2006, there were 604 alcohol-related highway fatalities in Georgia; this number accounts for nearly one-third of Georgia’s total fatalities.

One bad decision - drinking and driving just one time - can destroy a life. Please don’t drink and drive.

If you or a loved one has been injured by a drunk driver, contact The Law Offices of Michael L. Neff as soon as possible. We must act quickly to investigate the accident and preserve evidence.

We aggressively pursue irresponsible drunk drivers and hold them accountable to the full extent of the law. As a victim, you can sue for negligence and punitive damages. You can punish the irresponsible behavior on the part of the drunk driver - and Jacqui Saburido would agree that you should punish such behavior. Too many innocent people have been victims of drunk drivers.

You may also be able to sue the liquor store, bar, or restaurant that served the drunk driver. For example, if a restaurant served someone who was obviously intoxicated, then you can also hold the restaurant accountable for your injuries.

If you’ve been injured by a drunk driver, call (404) 531-9700 to schedule your free consultation with Michael Lawson Neff.

Labels: , , , , ,


Sunday, May 3, 2009

  Atlanta Attorney - Injury Personal

Have you suffered a personal injury? Are you worried about how you're going to pay your medical bills? Atlanta personal injury attorney Michael Neff can help.

Michael Neff specializes in tractor trailer wrecks and other automobile accidents, suing drunk drivers for personal injury, violent crime attacks, medical malpractice, injuries on the job, and falls, trips, and slips of all kinds, whenever another party is liable for negligence.

Injuries to Your Person

Motor vehicle collisions make up the most common type of personal injury cases. Medical malpractice and medical neglect are also common.

Sadly, nursing home neglect is all too common. Signs of nursing home neglect may include frequent injuries, pressure ulcers, broken bones, heavy medication or sedation, malnutrition, dehydration, rapid weight loss or weight gain, and unexplained death. If you have a relative or loved one in a nursing home, visit them often. If you suspect neglect, you may want to file a complaint with the Georgia Department of Human Resources Office of Regulatory Services or pursue legal action.

Businesses and property owners may be negligent. If their negligence causes a personal injury, then you can sue. Property owners, for instance, must provide adequate security and notice of dangerous conditions.

If you're injured by a defective product or your neighbor's dog, then you may be entitled to compensation as well.

And, of course, you'll likely sustain a personal injury if someone attacks you intentionally, as in the case of violent crime.

Injuries to Your Reputation

Defamation, the issuance of a false statement about you, may injure your reputation, business, or livelihood. Libel includes making a defamatory statement in print, while slander involves oral defamation.

Injuries to Your Property

Theft, embezzlement, wrongful conversion, and vandalism may cause injuries to your property. Often, a property damage claim will need to be filed separately from a personal injury claim. An experienced lawyer will be able to tell you how to best proceed.

Get the Personal Injury Compensation You Deserve

If you've suffered any of the above injures, then you may be entitled to compensation. It is your legal right to hold accountable whoever caused your injury and associated impairment, medical bills, loss of income, and decreased quality of life.

During the aftermath of a personal injury, contacting an attorney may be the last thing on your mind, but it's important to do so quickly. (You can bet that the opposing insurance company will have an investigator on the scene as soon as possible!) As time passes, evidence may disappear. If your attorney can investigate the case promptly, you'll have a better chance of being awarded the benefits you deserve. Additionally, your claims may be waved if they're not brought about in a timely manner; thus, you can lose your chance of recovery if you don't act promptly.

Michael Neff - Atlanta Attorney - Injury Personal

To consult with an attorney about your personal injury questions, please send your questions or concerns via e-mail to mneff@mlnlaw.com or call (404) 531-9700. For more information, see Personal Injury – Atlanta, Georgia Personal Injury Lawyer.

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Sunday, September 21, 2008

  Injured child's family can sue for emotional distress

Family members who saw a young boy bloodied and apparently lifeless immediately after he was struck by a car can sue for intentional infliction of emotional distress according to the Tennessee Supreme Court.

The mother and siblings of a boy who was struck by a vehicle in front of his school sustained permanent brain damage.

When the mother arrived with her other children they saw the boy lying unattended on the pavement in a pool of blood. They screamed and tried to reach him but were restrained.

The family sued the driver and the school district. They also served their own insurer with the complaint pursuant to the state's underinsured motorist law.

The insurer asserted that the family's emotional distress claims failed because they didn't witness the event that actually caused the child's injury.

The family argued that sensory observation was not an essential element of the claim due to their close relationship with the child.

The court cited similar cases from New Hampshire, New Jersey, Texas, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. The name of the case is Eskin v. Bartee, No. W2006-01336-SC-R11-CV.

Labels: , , ,


Wednesday, July 30, 2008

  Jury foreman laments a grueling mistrial

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution today published an editorial from a Cobb County resident who was a foreman on a traffic accident and personal injury case. The Cobb County state court judge indicated that the trial would likely last three days, but that became longer because the deliberations deadlocked as members remained entrenched in their positions. The judge declared a mistrial.

The foreman reflects: “I feel miserable at my own performance. I failed myself and my fellow jurors by not being able to mediate some sort of agreement. I failed [the judge], who had charged us with reaching a conclusion. I failed the defendant and the plaintiff for the same reasons. And I failed the citizens of the county in that this will now become more of a cost burden on our society at a time when austerity is more needed than ever. My failure means there will likely be another frivolous suit tried, more costs for the court, and higher premiums on our auto insurance.”

Michael Neff's position:

There is a reason why our court system is requires a unanimous agreement by all jurors - so that one person with strong opinions can't force a conclusion that is contrary to the evidence. The article stated that at least 3 people on the jury didn't agree with the foreperson that the case was "frivolous."

The foreperson wrote that he was concerned about people's auto insurance. He didn't mention that he had previously given money to the Trucking Industry's Political Action Committee. That doesn't mean he is a bad person. But perhaps he walked into court with some personal opinions and beliefs that made him more likely to see the case from the standpoint of big business. Georgia law forbids the mention of auto insurance in a personal injury trial. So he most likely walked into court with information and beliefs that were pro business.

I hope he was honest when he answered the voir dire questions at the beginning of the trial. The whole reason for jury selection is to identify people whose strong beliefs and experiences may indicate that they should not serve on a particular jury

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,


Tuesday, July 22, 2008

  Studies show older drivers can be safety risk

According to the Governors Highway Safety Assocation, the percentage of Americans 65 and older has tripled in the past 100 years. People are living longer. As a result, it is more and more likely that many Georgians will outlive their ability to drive safely.

According to the American Medical Association, older drivers (also referred to as mature drivers) have a higher risk of traffic fatalities for two reasons. First, drivers aged 75 and older are involved in significantly more car wrecks per mile driven than middle-aged drivers. Second, mature drivers are considerably more fragile than their younger counterparts, and are therefore more likely to suffer a fatal injury in the event of a crash.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) found that auto accidents actually account for fewer than 1 percent of fatalities among people 70 and older (heart disease and cancer are the leading causes of death). However, increasingly older drivers are keeping their drivers licenses longer and driving more miles than ever before.

An AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety study in 2004 found that drivers over the age of 65 are almost twice as likely to die in car crashes as drivers aged 55 to 64. The report also revealed that drivers over 75 were over two-and-a-half times as likely to die in an auto accident and drivers over 85 were almost four times as likely to die when compared to drivers aged 55 to 64.

The excess crash rate of mature drivers results from impairments in three functions that are important for driving: vision, cognition and motor function.

Vision - Vision is the primary sense utilized in driving. Adequate visual acuity and field of vision are important for safe driving, but tend to decline with age as a result of physiologic changes and an increase in diseases such as cataracts, glaucoma, macular degeneration and stroke. Glare, impaired contrast sensitivity, and an increase in time to adjust to changes in lightness and darkness are other problems commonly experienced by mature drivers. According to the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, a person's eyesight deteriorates to such an extent that ten times the amount of light is necessary to see objects at age 60 as that needed at age 16.

Cognition - Driving is a complex activity that requires a variety of high-level cognitive skills, including memory, visual processing, attention and executive skills. Certain medical conditions (such as dementia) and medications that are common in the older population have a large impact on cognition.

Motor function - Motor abilities such as muscle strength, endurance, flexibility and proprioception (the subconscious awareness of weight, posture, movement, position in space in relationship to the body, based on sensory input from the joints and muscles) are necessary for operating vehicle controls and turning to view traffic. Even prior to driving, motor abilities are needed to enter the car safely and fasten the seat belt. Changes related to age and musculoskeletal diseases (such as arthritis) can decrease an individual's ability to drive safely and comfortably.

Changes in vision, physical strength and cognition can contribute to a loss of self-confidence and ability to operate a motor vehicle. The prospect of losing one's drivers license is equated by some older adults as a loss of independence and personal freedom. Faced with this choice, some older adults risk personal injury rather than give up their driver's license.

Georgia addresses these risks by requiring that drivers over 60 renew their licenses every 5 years. Also, license renewals cannot be done by mail. Georgia drivers 65 and older also need a vision test.

Labels: , , , ,


Sunday, June 8, 2008

  $1.2 Million Jury Verdict in Rear-end Accident in California

In 2005, Ms. Kathleen Donovan was stopped in traffic north of Ventura, California, when her sedan was rear-ended by a pickup truck driven by Patrick Gallagher, an employee of Gold Coast Erectors. Larry Johnson, another driver and an employee of Weatherford USLP, had been driving between Donovan and Gallagher, but swerved out of the lane when Donovan stopped. Ms. Donovan sustained fatal injuries and died at the scene of the wreck.

Her mother, Constance Donovan, sued Gallagher, Gold Coast Erectors, Johnson and Weatherford USLP, alleging negligence.

Gallagher and Gold Coast Erectors admitted liability but argued that Johnson and Weatherford were also negligent. Both Johnson and his firm denied liability. Gallagher contended that he was driving behind Johnson’s vehicle, which blocked his view of Ms. Donovan. Gallagher argued that Johnson did not slow appropriately, forcing him to swerve out of the lane when Ms. Donovan stopped and that this was negligent, because it compromised his opportunity to avoid the collision.

Constance Donovan did not seek any economic damages, as she was not financially dependent on her daughter at the time of her death, but asked the jury for $3.5 to $4.5 million in noneconomic damages for the value of her daughter's life. The jury awarded her $1.2 million in noneconomic damages, with 90 percent of the fault to Gallagher and Gold Coast Erectors and 10 percent to Johnson and Weatherford USLP.

Even though you may be among the safest drivers on the road, you never know when the actions of those around you can cause injury and death. The Law Offices of Michael L. Neff ask you to drive defensively; and if you or a loved one has been injured in a Georgia car or truck accident that was someone else’s fault, call us or email us immediately before evidence is destroyed. Let us help you get the settlement you deserve.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,


Thursday, April 24, 2008

  Tragic wreck in Gwinnett County

As reported by ANDRIA SIMMONS The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 04/06/08

A few minutes after dusk last Monday, five drivers made their way north from Atlanta on I-85, unaware their lives were about to intersect.

Adekunle Akinmola, 42, had just finished checking a rental property he owns in Stone Mountain. He expected a quiet evening at home in Dacula with his wife and four children.

Scott Hoeft, 45, a roofing contractor, had left the VA Hospital to join his wife and son in Suwanee.

Mehboob Hashim, 49, and his 11-year-old son had just come from Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, where he met his two sisters, in town from London to attend a relative's wedding. The sisters and Hashim's wife rode in a separate car.

"My son was talking about his school, what he wanted to do on spring break," Hashim recalled. "I was telling him hopefully we'll go out somewhere."

They were the lucky ones — Akinmola, Hoeft and Hashim. They made it home at the end of the night, badly shaken and emotionally devastated, but nevertheless alive.

At about 8:30 p.m. Monday, those three drivers were caught up in a five-car, chain-reaction collision that state DOT officials said was the deadliest to occur in northeast Georgia in the past 15 years.

The fates of the remaining two drivers — Mark Anthony Gay, 44, and Carmon Cody Rhoden, 20 — were about to become intertwined.

A baseball fanatic, Rhoden was driving home to Gainesville from the Atlanta Braves home opener, which he attended with a buddy he worked with at the Rhoden family's tire shop in Gainesville. The two young men were discussing fishing and baseball to pass the time on the hourlong ride home, said Jeffrey Sliz, Rhoden's lawyer.

The atmosphere was lighthearted that evening in Gay's Ford Excursion limousine.

Seated in the back, the Randle family was reminiscing happily about a recent trip to their former home near Salt Lake City. The mother and father, the couple's two children, future son-in-law and baby grandson had gone to catch up with old friends and attend a wedding.

Gay, a widower and father to a 15-year-old son, had taken the family to the airport about a week earlier. Now he was taking them home to Lawrenceville.

One family member, Falleen Randle, 43, was talking on a cellphone with her brother, "laughing and joking" as she described the trip, her sister Sulianna Chandler said.

The limousine approached the intersection of Indian Trail Lilburn Road in Norcross, about eight miles from its destination.

In a split-second, the lives of the five drivers converged.

Brakes screeched, glass shattered, metal crunched and a sea of cars traveling behind them ground to a halt as a chain-reaction wreck unfolded.

Police said Rhoden was driving recklessly, speeding and weaving in and out of lanes when he clipped the SUV limo.

The limo slammed into the back of a Toyota Corolla driven by Hashim and flipped several times. A few feet away, Akinmola's Mercedes and Hoeft's Ford F-150 pickup truck collided in the center lane.

Killed were Gay and three members of the Randle family: Alexander Randle, 14; his sister, Whitney Randle, 21; and Whitney's 13-month-old son, Kayden Alexander Randle-Finley.

Demetrius Randle, 45, Alexander and Whitney's father and the baby's grandfather, suffered a severe head injury. He was in critical condition Friday at Gwinnett Medical Center.

Rhoden was arrested the following day on multiple charges, including first-degree vehicular homicide.

The drivers who survived say they are still haunted by memories of the accident.

Hoeft's left knee was banged up in the crash, and he had to take a few days off work because the truck he uses on the job was impounded. Flashbacks keep him awake at night.

"I've seen it every night in my sleep," Hoeft said. "I haven't slept more than two hours a night since it happened."

Hashim considers himself lucky, even though his car was badly damaged and his son suffered a bruise from the seat belt.

If Hashim's wife had not lost her parking receipt at the airport, causing a 10-minute delay, she and his two sisters probably would have been involved in the crash, too.

"Thank God that she wasn't there. It would have been very bad," Hashim said.

Akinmola's neck and back are sore, and he keeps visualizing the grisly aftermath of the crash.

Like the other drivers, Akinmola has been turning the events over in his mind, trying to find answers to the difficult questions of life and death, suffering and salvation.

"I keep thinking about it, how it could have been me," Akinmola said. "People like me and the other people that survived, it's not because we're special or anything. I believe it's just God wants to keep us alive for whatever the reasons are. It's by his grace that we're alive."

http://www.ajc.com/services/content/metro/gwinnett/stories/2008/04/05/metwreck_0406a_3DOT.html?cxtype=rss&cxsvc=7&cxcat=13

Labels: ,


Tuesday, April 22, 2008

  Volvo working on crashless car

Volvo has a project for a new automobile - called PreVENT. The project is based on computer software that uses existing technology that, in event of a possible collusion, allows the car's intelligent system to take over and execute evasive maneuvers. Despite using currently available equipment, it will be some time before we see this system implemented in the real world. For now you'll just have to keep relying on airbags, seatbelts, and luck.

http://crave.cnet.com/8301-1_105-9922480-1.html?tag=cnetfd.mt

Labels: , ,


Tuesday, April 15, 2008

  Sturdier Cars Slow Rescuers

http://www.breitbart.com/print.php?id=D8VGLPDG3&show_article=1


By MITCH STACY
Associated Press Writer
TAMPA, Fla. (AP) - Capt. Clint Roberts makes his living cutting accident victims out of hideously mangled vehicles, but even he could hardly believe it when two people in a 2007 midsize car survived a head-on crash with a full- sized pickup last year.

The Ford Fusion's reinforced steel construction probably saved the lives of the 18-year-old driver and his 16-year-old passenger. But Roberts said it gave his Hillsborough County Fire Rescue crew fits as they tried to free them last November.

Because hydraulic cutters couldn't shear the roof posts, rescue workers had to turn to heavy-duty electric saws, replacing blade after blade as they dulled on the rugged material.

"It was just beating the snot out of the tools," adding minutes and delaying medical treatment, Roberts said.

There is no question that today's cars save lives by cocooning motorists in reinforced alloys, impact-absorbing crumple zones and as many as a dozen air bags.

But in interviews with The Associated Press, rescue officials and experts from around the United States said the new technology is also hindering extrication of injured people, increasingly forcing crews to work deeper into the critical "golden hour" between accident and treatment by emergency room doctors. On many 2005 and later cars, an extrication that once took 10 or 15 minutes can now take twice that or longer.

To catch up, counties and cities are spending tens of thousands of dollars—if they can afford it—to buy more powerful equipment that can cut through newer cars' reinforced steel and the lighter, tougher exotic metals used in roofs, posts and doors.

Then there are obstacles that endanger rescuers' safety. Pressurized gas canisters that inflate air bags can explode if pierced by cutting tools. Rescuers can be blown from cars when air bags suddenly inflate. Hidden battery cables in hybrid cars can deliver a powerful shock.

To protect themselves, workers now have to peel away the ceiling and interior plastic to see what's underneath before they can even start cutting.

Experts cannot say for certain whether the delays in getting these victims to the hospital have resulted in people dying. But that's the fear.

"We build more fire stations, we make faster fire trucks, we've got helicopters to get you to the hospital," said Roberts, an expert who teaches extrication to colleagues around Florida. "But what's slowing us down are these vehicles that are harder for us to get into."

The problem has rescue workers scrambling to update their tools and explore different ways to attack cars with their cutters, spreaders and saws. Some agencies with equipment more than a few years old are arriving at accident scenes and finding out that it will no longer do the job.

"Because their shearing materials had been so successful for so many years, some agencies hadn't developed a Plan B," said Tom Hollenstain, who works to educate rescuers about new auto technology at the State Farm Insurance vehicle research center.

Leading hydraulic-tool makers such as Hurst Jaws of Life—whose namesake George Hurst introduced the first hydraulic extrication tools for auto racing in the early 1970s—must keep putting more oomph into their equipment, making it heavier and more expensive. A single Hurst cutter and power unit runs about $25,000. Add hydraulic spreaders and other tools and the price rises quickly.

A fire crew in Bonita Springs, Fla., discovered the problem last year when it rolled up on a 2007 Lexus that had overturned. Hydraulic cutters only a few years old wouldn't shear the strengthened steel roof posts, so the crew had to move quickly to cut other parts of the car. A job that should have taken a few minutes required 20 minutes of cutting and sawing to remove the driver.

Assistant Chief Ken Craft said the incident led the department to buy new heavy rescue tools costing $54,000—a sizable expense for a city of around 40,000.

"If the automakers roll out something new next year, we could be right back where we were at," Craft said. "That's the problem we're confronted with."

Mike Ader, a volunteer firefighter in Rockville, Md., recalled the layered-steel roof post from a 2008 Toyota Camry that wouldn't budge under the blades of a hydraulic cutter after a broadside crash Jan. 2. The patient, whose injuries were serious but not life-threatening, finally had to be maneuvered around the post.

Ader used two types of saws and numerous blades to remove the post after the patient was removed. The department quickly decided to buy a new, more powerful cutter.

The flip side, of course, is that more people are surviving horrific crashes that would have killed them just a few years ago.

The Fusion's passenger, for example, was hurt but conscious and joking with Roberts as the crew worked to get him out. The driver of the other vehicle—a 2001 Ford F-150 pickup—was dead at the scene.

With about three people hurt in car crashes every minute in the United States, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration spokesman Rae Tyson said he is comfortable with the trade-off. Rescue workers, he said, will have to work harder to keep up with technology, just like everybody else.

"The fatality rate for passenger vehicles is the lowest in history," Tyson said. "That, to me, is a pretty good news story."

One problem for rescue workers is how to get the latest technical information about newer cars and how to deal with them.

Later this year, the nonprofit group COMCARE Emergency Response Alliance, with cooperation from automakers, is introducing a single Web site that will offer schematics and safety specs for most cars on the road. Rescue workers could flip open a laptop computer on the way to a crash scene to find out about the construction of the car, placement of air bag canisters and other details.

Automakers say they are doing more to make safety information available to rescuers and tool makers before new models come out. For instance, Ford is already offering a look at the skeleton of the 2009 F-150 pickup, built with the strongest steel construction the company has ever used.

"We want to facilitate the discussion as much as possible, because we understand the critical nature of their work," Ford spokesman Wesley Sherwood said.

Labels: , , ,


Sunday, February 18, 2007

  Safe Driving Suggestions - A stuck gas pedal

Fortunately, this doesn't happen too often. But keeping these suggestions in mind may avoid a car wreck:

What to do if your gas pedal sticks

* Tap the gas pedal to try to unstick the throttle linkage.

* Hook your toe under the pedal to try and free it.

* Shift to neutral and apply firm pressure to the brakes without locking the wheels.

* Find a safe place to move the vehicle completely off the road.

* If your automobile has power steering or a locking steering wheel, do not turn off the ignition or you will lose either your power steering, or the ability to steer.

* Have your vehicle checked with a mechanic as soon as possible.


Sources: North Carolina Department of Transportation, sos.state.il.us

Labels: , ,


Saturday, February 17, 2007

  Fatigue a problem for all drivers

February 16th's Atlanta Journal Consitution had an article again noting the importance of sleep. Sleep is frequently a big problem for all drivers - particularly truck drivers who have to drive long hours or at night. As a result, there are limits on drivers hours. However, those rules are sometimes broken with disaterous results that can cause death or serious injuries.

Read the article below for some important tips

DRIVER'S ED: Tired? Well, big sleep is forever

zzzZZZ...

zzzZZZ...

Uh? Wha? Sorry. Must a dozed off for a bit. Which can be embarrassing behind a keyboard but is flat-out deadly dangerous behind the wheel. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates 100,000 crashes a year are caused by DWD —- driving while drowsy.

When you're driving at 65 mph, in just 3 seconds you'll travel more than 100 yards. And that is a long ways to go with your eyes closed and no control of your car. Just being drowsy ups the odds you'll make a mistake like misjudging the speed of oncoming traffic when you're making a left turn.

And don't be too sure you know when you're too sleepy to be driving. In one study of drivers who crashed after falling asleep at the wheel, half said they felt only "somewhat sleepy" or "not at all sleepy" just before the loud bang. Here are some tips:

1 Hot java. A cup of coffee is tasty, but it ain't a magic potion. The caffeine will help you be a bit more alert, but it takes 30 minutes to get into your bloodstream and the effects last just a couple of hours. And you can still nod off for a couple of seconds.

2 Start rested. Working hard all day Friday and heading to Orlando to be at Braves spring training first thing Saturday morning is a bad idea. Less than six hours of shut-eye increases risk of falling asleep.

3 Stop and stretch. Stop every two hours or so and get out of the car to move around. Even if it's just to walk into the convenience store to get a Coke.

4 Warning signs. Pull over soon as you safely can if you find yourself having a hard time keeping your eyes open or focusing on the road ahead. If you're drifting from lane to lane or tailgating or hitting the rumble strips on the shoulder, it's time to stop. It's better to take a little longer to get where you're going than not get there at all.

Ed got his tips from the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.

Ed is a shade-tree mechanic who talks like a dipstick but knows his way around one.

Labels: , , , ,


Friday, February 16, 2007

  Women more likely than men to be hurt in car wreck

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Women more likely than men to be hurt in car wrecks?

This was an interesting article that ran in the Atlanta Journal Constitution and other newspapers.

Car crash injuries vary with age, gender
By VIRGINIA ANDERSON
Cox News Service

Sunday, January 07, 2007

ATLANTA — Age and gender play a major role in the severity of injuries in car crashes, a fact that might steer future safety features in automobiles, according to a study by Purdue University researchers.

The findings, published in the Journal of Safety Research, suggest that vehicles designed to adapt to specific drivers could lessen the severity of injuries, said co-author Fred Mannering, a professor of civil engineering at the West Lafayette, Ind., university.

For example, with existing sensor technology, cars could detect the height and weight of a driver and the car's safety system could adjust, Mannering said.

Safety-belt tension could be varied, and the way air bags deploy could be personalized.

"What it really means is that it's an opportunity for auto manufacturers to design cars more safely," Mannering said.

Most automakers already are installing sophisticated air-bag systems — called dual-stage air bags — that adjust to the severity of the crash and the size of the driver, said Joe Nolan, head of the Vehicle Research Center of the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety, where crash testing is done.

"The [study] author's recommendation is, indeed, happening," Nolan said.

More stringent federal regulations, cheaper technology and buyer demand have moved car makers to quickly improve air-bag systems, Nolan said.

The study, a review of 32,085 Indiana vehicle crashes in 1999, also showed that age and gender play a role in the types of crashes people have.

The findings confirmed again that younger male drivers with passengers in the car were much more likely to suffer serious or fatal injuries when they are in a crash than older men or women of all age groups — a fact that parents, lawmakers and auto manufacturers should keep in mind, Mannering said.

Some findings were more surprising to the researchers.

For instance, driving a newer vehicle — less than five years old — actually increased the likelihood of fatality for older men by 216 percent.

A newer vehicle also increased the likelihood of fatality for young men, but by a lower percentage — 71 percent. The age of a vehicle did not have a significant effect on the likelihood of a fatality for middle-aged men.

Among women, safety belt usage in different age groups was a factor in the likelihood of injury, Mannering said.

Not using safety belts increased the likelihood of injury by 119 percent for young women, 164 percent for middle-aged women and 187 percent for older women.

The study did not examine the reasons for the differences. Mannering said he and co-author Samantha Islam could only speculate why the striking differences occurred.

Variations in reaction times among drivers could play a role, as well as the fit of safety belts, based on driver size, Mannering said.

The likelihood of injury from air-bag deployment may vary from age group to age group and between genders, he said.

Decreased bone density among older women may contribute to air-bag injuries, he speculated.

Even though the reasons may be unclear, Mannering said further study may reveal answers that may result in vehicle design changes.

"It's clear that that's the next direction," he said.

While that almost certainly would increase the cost of autos, Mannering said he believes those expenditures would be offset by saving money on lower insurance rates and medical bills for injuries sustained in crashes.

Virginia Anderson writes for The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Journal-Constitution writer Clint Williams contributed to this article.

Labels: , , ,




  Airbags can cause hearing loss

National News
Car Airbags Can Cause Permanent Hearing Loss, Study Says
February 14, 2007

A researcher at a national hearing conference will present data that predicts 17 percent of people exposed to deployed airbags in American cars will suffer from permanent hearing loss. His data also shows, contrary to what experts have previously thought, airbag deployment is more hazardous to the ear when a car's windows are rolled down.

These are among the results that will be presented by auditory physiologist Dr. G. Richard Price at the National Hearing Conservation Association's 32nd annual hearing conference. The conference, titled, "A Passion to Preserve," will be held Feb. 15-17 at the Hyatt Regency in Savannah, Ga.

In Price's study of car airbag deployment, he sought to determine whether the auditory danger was greatest in cars with the windows down or the windows up. Previously, experts thought rolled-up windows were more dangerous because they allow for higher pressure to be created inside the cabin.

The research concludes, counterintuitively, that having car windows rolled up when airbags are deployed is actually less hazardous to the ear than rolled-down windows. This is because the higher pressure generated in the closed cabin actually prevents greater damage to the ear. The pressure causes a displacement in the middle ear that stiffens the stapes, a small bone outside the inner ear. This stiffening limits the transmission of energy to the inner ear, where hearing damage takes place. In airbag experiments where the cabin is completely sealed and pressure is even higher, hearing damage is reduced even further.

Price's study only included cars sold in the United States with front and side airbags. Under U.S. regulations, American cars must have larger, more powerful airbags than cars sold in places like Europe. Cars with smaller airbags sold in other parts of the world would likely pose less auditory danger when tested under identical circumstances, Price said.

"We often consider only the benefits of safety technology, rather than the unfortunate potential side effects," said NHCA Director of Education Brian Fligor. "This type of study highlights how common everyday occurrences present a very real hazard to our hearing."

Find this article at:
http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2007/02/14/76958.htm

Labels: , , ,


Archives

February 2007   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   January 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010  

This page 

is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]