<
Michael Lawson Neff, P.C. | Atlanta Personal Injury Lawyers
PRACTICE AREAS
Michael Lawson Neff | Personal Injury Lawyer, Atlanta
Blog
Atlanta, Georgia Personal Injury Lawyer



Atlanta personal injury lawyer blog Wednesday, February 3, 2010

  Lawsuit Filed over Exploding House in Cleveland

The Cleveland Plain Dealer in Ohio reports that a lawsuit has been filed over an exploding house!

The lawsuit alleges that the Dominion East Ohio Gas Company and an investment company are to blame for the explosion of a Cleveland house a January 25. The explosion caused damage to 57 buildings.

Investigators have not yet announced the cause of the explosion, but the lawsuit, which was filed in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, alleges that Dominion and California-based EZ Access Funding are responsible.

According to the lawsuit filed by attorney Scott Kalish, EZ Access failed to maintain the house on West 83rd Street, which had been vacant since last summer. Further, Dominion failed to make sure that the gas was shut off, even though residents in the neighborhood had complained of an odor of gas four days before the explosion.

Gerald Walton, attorney for EZ Access, said, “They were totally unaware that there were any utilities to that house. They never authorized or requested that any utilities were turned on.”

Kalish represents three homeowners whose houses were damaged by the blast as well as a dozen other people who rent homes in the area. Kalish said that approximately 60 property owners and 80 renters were affected by the explosion. At least four people received minor injuries.

One resident represented by Kalish is Terry Calderwood, whose home was damaged so badly that it had to be demolished. Kalish told reporters, “She’s essentially homeless now.”

The Cleveland attorney hopes that the lawsuit will be certified as a class action lawsuit since it affected so many people.

What a bizarre news story! I find it hard to believe that the gas company did not respond to reports about the odor of gas. The number one natural gas safety tip from safegas.org is: “SMELL GAS? ACT FAST! If you smell gas RIGHT NOW—don't touch or turn off your computer—leave the area! After you go someplace away from the odor, call your natural gas provider. If you don't know that number, dial emergency services, 9-1-1.”

Other tips from the gas safety website include:

Don’t ever let small children play with or near natural gas appliances or pipes, even the knobs on the oven or cooktop.

Don’t use your stove or oven for anything other than cooking (for instance, to heat your home, under any circumstances).

Don’t move or install a gas appliance or change the connector in any way without professional assistance.

Don’t use a space heater UNTIL you are sure it has been vented properly. If using a vent-free heater, make sure the automatic cut-off switch is operational.

Don’t install a gas appliance yourself, unless you area a qualified contractor. Instead, you should always seek professional assistance.

Don’t ever store household chemicals or combustible materials near gas appliances.

Have all gas appliances, furnaces, vents, flues, chimneys and gas lines in your home or business inspected every year or two by qualified industry professionals.

Keep the areas around all appliances and equipment clean and unblocked to allow for proper air flow.

Follow manufacturer instructions for the care and use of gas appliances and equipment.

Make sure there is at least one multipurpose fire extinguisher in your home or place of business.

Use your nose. If you ever detect even a small amount of the odor of natural gas in the air, don’t stay—get away. Then, contact your natural gas provider. If you don’t know that number, dial emergency services, 9-1-1.

Labels: ,


Monday, December 14, 2009

  Cornell Professor Sues Wesleyan University over Misleading Photograph

Personal injury lawsuit commonly involve around slip and fall accidents or auto accidents that results in bodily injuries, but an individual may also received a personal injury to his or her reputation. That’s why Cornell University Professor Stephen L. Morgan is suing Wesleyan University. The lawsuit claims that Wesleyan released a photograph to national and international media outlets that identified the professor as the alleged killed of 21-year-old Wesleyan student Johanna Justin-Jinich.

Stephen L. Morgan, 38, is a sociology professor who lives in Ithaca, NY, and teaches at Cornell - hundreds of miles from Wesleyan’s Middletown campus. He says that he has suffered “humiliation, mental anguish and emotional distress” from the photo mix-up that happened in May.

Connecticut State Police and Middletown police officers gave the photograph of the Cornell professor to Wesleyan University. The officers had gotten the image from a driver’s license database. According to Morgan’s attorney, the photo was taken when he was a student at Harvard University.

Police were looking for Stephen P. Morgan, a 29-year-old man from Massachusetts. They sent the photo of Professor Morgan to Wesleyan University officials so that they could determine if the professor had any kind of connection with the school. The officers did not give the university permission to publish or release the image. But, of course, Wesleyan did release the image. The photo was published on several websites and even appeared on CNN with a report which stated “police believe he may be targeting the school and Jews.”

Then Wesleyan employees began to notice comments on a university message board which stated that the man in the photo did not resemble the gunman in surveillance videos. University officials realized that the man in the photo they had released was not the murder suspect. By then, the damage had already been done to Professor Morgan’s reputation.

“Dr. Morgan has been forced to expend significant amounts of time and effort explaining that he is not a murderer to his family, friends, colleagues, students, professional associates, and others,” states the lawsuit. “Through these statements, [Wesleyan] implied that Dr. Morgan murdered the victim and may murder others because of their Jewish faith thereby implying that Dr. Morgan was a homicidal racist.”

Dr. Morgan has not commented on the case. His attorney James K. Robertson said, “Wesleyan was understandably in turmoil, but that doesn’t justify the reckless damage to Dr. Morgan’s spotless reputation.”

Robertson also said that the professor is still contacting various websites in an effort to have his photography taken down. “It seems to be a story without an end,” said Robertson.

Police eventually caught the right man, Stephen P. Morgan, 29, a former Navy petty officer, and charged him with Justin-Jinich’s murder. The two had met in a summer class at New York University.

If someone else has damaged your professional reputation, you may be eligible for compensation. Contact a Georgia personal injury attorney as soon as possible. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: ,


Thursday, November 26, 2009

  Jury Awards $300 Million to Former Smoker

Last week a Florida jury ordered cigarette manufacturer Philip Morris USA to pay $300 million in damages to Cindy Naugle, 61, a former smoker who is now wheelchair bound because of emphysema.

The award included $244 million in punitive damages and $56.6 million in past and future medical expenses. The award from the Broward Circuit Court jury is the largest of the so-called Engle progeny tobacco cases that have been tried so far. According to data compiled by Bloomberg, the award is the seventh-largest jury verdict in the U.S. this year.

Naugle’s lawsuit is just one of the approximately 8,000 filed after the 2006 Florida Supreme Court decision that threw out a large class action against tobacco companies. The original Engle v. RJ Reynolds verdict, stemming from a 1994 class action lawsuit, was $145 billion – the largest verdict in U.S. history at trial. The 2006 ruling that overturned the verdict on appeal allowed some of the 700,000 plaintiffs known as the “Engle progeny” to file lawsuits on an individual basis. Howard Engle received an undisclosed settlement reported to be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Philip Morris is expected to appeal the verdict in the case of Naugle v. Philip Morris USA. Philip Morris spokesman Murray Garnick said there were “numerous erroneous rulings by the trial judge.”

“We believe that the punitive damages award is grossly excessive and a clear violation of constitutional and state law,” added Garnick. “From the beginning, this case was marked by a fundamentally unfair and unconstitutional trial plan that allowed the jury to rely on findings by a prior jury.”

Naugle is a garage officer manager and bookkeeper from Fort Lauderdale, Florida. She started smoking in 1968 when she was 20 years old. She said that she thought smoking would make her look older and more sophisticated. She smoked Benson and Hedges cigarettes, which are marketed as sophisticated and feminine. Naugle smoked until she was 45, when she quit in 1993 with the aid of nicotine patches. Incidentally, she is the sister of Fort Lauderdale’s former mayor, Jim Naugle. Attorney Bob Kelley said that Naugle “spends every minute of every day as if she were drowning.” Tubes protrude from her nose and connect to a portable oxygen concentrator so that she can breathe.

Philip Morris has been ordered to pay the entire punitive portion of the verdict ($244 million), plus 90 percent of compensatory damages. The jury decided that Naugle was 10 percent responsible for her injuries.

Naugle’s attorneys, Bob Kelley, Todd Falzone and Todd McPharlin of the Kelley Uustal law firm in Fort Lauderdale, successfully argued that Philip Morris was guilty of fraud since the company had knowingly concealed the fact that cigarettes were addictive and harmful to health.

“She cried,” McPharlin said of Naugle’s reaction to the verdict. “She was just overcome.”

The jury reached the verdict in less than three hours of deliberation. The trial lasted 16 days before Broward County Circuit Court Judge Jeffrey Streitfeld.

So far, the tobacco industry has lost 8 out of 10 individual cases that have gone to trial. As many as 50 more trials against the tobacco industry are scheduled to begin in 2010.

If you’ve been injured because of corporate fraud, contact an experienced Georgia personal injury attorney as soon as possible. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels:


Wednesday, November 25, 2009

  New “Hot Coffee” Documentary Examines America’s Most Famous Personal Injury Case



Ask people on the street to name America’s most famous legal case, and you’ll likely hear Roe v. Wade or Brown v. Board of Education. But ask people to name the most famous personal injury case in American history, and you’ll definitely hear about the lady who spilled McDonald's hot coffee on herself and collected millions of dollars. The “hot coffee” case against McDonald’s became the prime example for frivolous lawsuits. Comedians from Seinfeld to Letterman made fun of the case. And the so-called “Stella Awards” for most outrageous lawsuits were named for the plaintiff in the hot coffee case, Stella Liebeck.

However, even though many people have heard of the case, they are not familiar with the details. Why is it that the jury awarded $2.9 million to Liebeck? Did McDonald’s have poor defense attorneys? And why did this case become so famous?

A new feature documentary, simply titled “Hot Coffee,” will explore these questions and more. The filmmakers say that the documentary will tell the story of what really happened to Stella. The filmmakers interviewed Stella’s grandson (who was the driver at the time of the incident), her doctor, the lawyers involved in the case, the quality assurance manager from McDonald’s, and the jurors.

“We will show how this case became so popular in the media (along with other examples of ‘frivolous’ lawsuits), who funded the effort and to what end,” said the filmmakers. “We will interview political scientists, law school professors and consumer advocates who have spent years analyzing media coverage of the tort system and who controlled the message. We will show how the media was used and continues to be used for a political agenda to prevent access to the court system and immunize corporations from civil liability. We will educate the audience about caps on the amount of money that victims can receive in court in most states, how the federal government has enacted laws to prevent people from their day in court, and how the small print on credit card and real estate contracts, for example, prevent people from being able to get into the court system, denying access to justice. We will explore judicial races in states where tort reform measures have passed and then were later found unconstitutional by the State’s Supreme Courts. In many of these states there were major public relations campaigns established by tort reform groups to unseat pro-consumer justices and replace them with pro-business justices. We will interview representatives from the American Tort Reform Association, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (who even recently started a new website called ‘Faces of Lawsuit Abuse’) and even Phillip Morris, to find out what their involvement was in keeping this story alive and the motivations behind it. We will let the audience decide who really profited from spilling hot coffee.”

I look forward to watching this documentary. Screenings are expected to begin in 2010. The film is directed by attorney Susan Salandoff, who has spent the last 25 years practicing law and representing those injured by individual and corporate negligence.

If you’ve been injured by individual or corporate negligence, contact an experienced Georgia personal injury attorney immediately. Time is of the essence. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule your consultation.

Labels:


Monday, November 16, 2009

  5 Reasons to Hire a Personal Injury Attorney in Georgia

Are you wondering if you should hire a Georgia personal injury attorney? What can a personal injury attorney do for you? Would it be a waste of time and money to hire a personal injury lawyer? Keep this in mind: If you decide to file a personal injury lawsuit, the defendant(s) will likely have experienced legal representation in their corner. You deserve the same.

Here are 5 reasons why you should hire a Georgia personal injury attorney:

1. A personal injury attorney will collect all available evidence. An experienced attorney knows how to collect all relevant facts and pieces of evidence. A personal injury attorney will help you secure photographs, official affidavits from any witnesses, and other key pieces of evidence. If you’re ever involved in an accident caused by negligence on the part of someone else, be sure to collect as much evidence as possible at the scene of the accident. Take photographs and collect contact information for all witnesses. A personal injury attorney will gather and organize all evidence so that it can be presented in a court of law.

2. A personal injury lawyer doesn’t get paid unless you win. In most cases, a personal injury attorney does not get paid unless you win the case. This is known as working on a contingency basis. Plaintiffs may have to pay the costs for some incidental expenses such as postage or copies, but the attorney doesn’t get paid unless you win the case.

3. A personal injury lawyer has perspective. Lawyers are trained to see a personal injury case from all points of view. They can anticipate the defense’s moves and rationally analyze the situation. After an accident, many individuals and family members are upset, sad, angry, or otherwise emotional. This can hurt their case in court. An attorney will remain calm and rational to keep things in proper perspective.

4. A personal injury attorney has experience. Here at MLN Law, we have handled hundreds of personal injury lawsuits. We understand the law, and we can put our experience to work for you to make sure you get the compensation you deserve.

5. A personal injury attorney knows the system. No system is perfect. An experienced attorney is adept at spotting imperfections within the system. Small technicalities can make all the difference in big cases. Experienced attorneys know the courts, the judges, and, in many cases, the opposing attorneys. Would it be better to settle or to go to trial? An experienced attorney will review all options and make sure that you get the best deal.

If you’ve been seriously injured, contact a Georgia personal injury attorney as soon as possible. You may be entitled to compensation, and an experienced attorney will help you get the compensation you deserve. Most people don’t like dealing with lawyers (including other lawyers), but an attorney will ensure that you have the best chance at justice. Remember: Contact an attorney as soon as possible after the injury. The longer you wait, the weaker your case becomes. If you wait too long, you could even lose your right to file a personal injury lawsuit. To schedule a free consultation, call MLN Law at 404-531-9700.

Labels: , ,


Thursday, November 12, 2009

  Georgia Personal Injury Lawsuit Statistics

The U.S. Department of Justice recently released a report detailing statistics about tort bench and jury trials in state courts in 2005. A tort involves one party alleging injury, damage or loss stemming from negligent or intentional acts by another party. According to the report, titled “Tort Bench and Jury Trials in State Courts, 2005,” torts accounted for about 60 percent of the estimated 26,948 tort, contract, and real property cases disposed of by bench or jury trial in state courts of general jurisdiction in 2005.

The report states that during 2005, an estimated 16,397 tort cases were disposed of by bench or jury trial in a national sample of state courts. Juries heard about 90 percent of the cases.

Bench and jury trials together accounted for an estimated 4 percent of all tort depositions in 2005.

Almost 60 percent of tort trials were automobile accident cases, and 15 percent involved medical malpractice claims.

Plaintiffs won about half of all tort trials.

Half of plaintiff winners in tort trials were awarded $24,000 or less in damages.

Punitive damages were sought in 9 percent of tort trials with winning plaintiffs, and the median punitive damage award was $55,000.

In the nation’s 75 most populous counties, the number of tort trials declined by about a third between 1996 and 2005.

In 2005, plaintiffs won 48 percent of all tort trials, including 61 percent of automobile accident trials, 19.4 percent of medical malpractice trials, 38.9 percent of premises liability trials, 50.4 percent of intentional tort trials, and 37.9 percent of product liability trials.

Median awards were $31,000 for all tort trials; $16,000 for automobile accident; $679,000 for medical malpractice; $90,000 for premises liability; $100,000 for intentional tort; and $748,000 for product liability.

Percentage of plaintiffs that won punitive damages was 3.6 percent for all tort trials; 1.6 percent for automobile accident; 2.6 percent for medical malpractice; 0.5 percent for premises liability; 24.3 percent for intentional tort; and 1.3 percent for product liability.

The median length of disposition of the tort case was 23 months for all tort trials; 20 months for automobile accident; 30.7 months for medical malpractice; 24 months for premises liability; 25.3 months for intentional tort; and 30 months for product liability.

It took six days to try the average medical malpractice lawsuit. Asbestos trials lasted an average of 13 days in trial, while other types of product liability cases lasted an average of 7 days.

Judges found for plaintiffs in 56 percent of tort trials, while juries ruled in favor of plaintiffs in 51 percent of tort trials.

In lawsuits involving medical malpractice, non-asbestos product liability, false arrest, or false imprisonment, plaintiffs prevailed less than a quarter of the time.

In Fulton County, Georgia, 52.9 percent of tort trials in state courts were automobile accident; 23.5 were premises liability; 5.9 percent were product liability; and 11.8 percent were medical malpractice.

If you’ve been through negligent or intentional acts by another party, contact an experienced Georgia personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. You may be entitled to compensation. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels:


Tuesday, September 1, 2009

  What are the Stella Awards?

You may not immediately recognize the name Stella Liebeck, but you’ve probably heard of the McDonald’s scalding coffee case. In 1992, Stella, 79 at the time, spilled a cup of McDonald’s scalding hot coffee onto her lap, and a jury awarded her $2.7 million in punitive damages.

But that’s not the whole story: McDonald’s served their coffee at scalding hot temperatures without letting customers know that it could burn them, and the coffee had a history of burning unsuspecting customers. Other establishments generally serve coffee at substantially lower temperatures than the 185+ degrees of McDonald’s coffee, which is hot enough to cause severe, third-degree burns. Also, a trial court subsequently reduced the punitive damages to $480,000.

Even though this case had merit (and McDonald’s now serves their coffee at a much lower, safer temperature thanks to Stella's lawsuit), the term “Stella Award” has been applied to outlandish, frivolous lawsuits.

A website at www.stellaawards.com keeps track of these cases, and Randy Cassingham has written a book titled The True Stella Awards, which is an Amazon.com best seller.

By presenting entertaining lawsuits, the independent website poses questions such as: Are the people involved in these cases using the courts to redress justifiable grievances that can't otherwise be settled? Or are they trying to extort money from anyone they can? Are the lawyers involved champions of justice? Or are they helping to abuse the system in the name of getting a piece of the action?

Here are the synopses of some of the “Stella Award” cases presented by the website:

Man says he is having heart attacks and got diabetes because he's obese. Why is he obese? Because McDonald's, Burger King, Wendy's and KFC failed to tell him that he shouldn't eat their fast food multiple times per week. Meanwhile, a federal judge throws out a similar case filed by obese children, but legal observers warn that's not the end of the issue.

Man uses restroom stall in city building that doesn't have a door knob. When he sticks his hand through the hole, he gets hurt -- and, of course, sues. He wins almost $3 million. His occupation? City claims examiner.

After an accident, transit authority discovers its driver is color-blind. Federal law requires commercial drivers to correctly see color, so he is pressured to resign. That's not the end, though: he sues, claiming "discrimination" against color-blind people -- even though he claims he is not color-blind.

Sharper Image received a bad review from Consumer Reports magazine for its "Ionic Breeze" air filter. Rather than improve the product, it sued the magazine. The judge ruled it was a "Strategic Suit Against Public Participation" -- an illegal "SLAPP" lawsuit, and sanctioned Sharper Image.

The website also points out “bogus” Stella Award cases, or urban legends, including the following:

Kathleen Robertson of Austin, Texas, was awarded $780,000 by a jury after breaking her ankle tripping over a toddler who was running amuck inside a furniture store. The owners of the store were understandably surprised at the verdict, considering the misbehaving tyke was Ms. Robertson's son. Fabricated.

In November, Mr. Grazinski purchased a brand new 32 foot Winnebago motor home. On his first trip home, having joined the freeway, he set the cruise control at 70 mph and calmly left the drivers seat to go into the back and make himself a cup of coffee. Not surprisingly, the Winnie left the freeway, crashed and overturned. Mr. Grazinski sued Winnebago for not advising him in the handbook that he could not actually do this. He was awarded $1,750,000 plus a new Winnebago. Fabricated.

Kara Walton of Claymont, Delaware, successfully sued the owner of a nightclub in a neighboring city when she fell from the bathroom window to the floor and knocked out her two front teeth. This occurred while Ms. Walton was trying to sneak through the window in the ladies room to avoid paying the $3.50 cover charge. She was awarded $12,000 and dental expenses. Fabricated.

The Stella Awards and the bogus cases are good for a laugh, but personal injury law is a serious matter. When you’re injured because of the negligence of another person or company, you need a experienced lawyer who will work hard and pursue all your options. If you’ve been injured, call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: ,


Thursday, June 4, 2009

  Georgia Spinal Cord Injury Lawyer

Spinal cord injuries are often devastating, both physically and emotionally. If you or a loved one has suffered a spinal cord injury at the fault of another, you need a Georgia spinal cord injury lawyer who can see your perspective as well as that of the court.

At MLN Law, we see spinal cord injury victims as human beings and not simply legal cases. We understand that spinal cord injuries completely change lives, but we also know that the injuries can be overcome. If you’ve suffered a spinal cord injury, you don’t have to give up your hopes, dreams, and aspirations. You can still lead a rewarding, productive life. In fact, some of our most inspiring clients have been quadriplegics and paraplegics.

Dealing with a spinal cord injury, however, is not easy. It is one of the worst physical injuries one can sustain, and it can also take its toll on family members and bank accounts. By working with doctors, physical therapists, financial planners, and other experts, as well as countless spinal cord injury victims over the years, we have come to understand what it takes to overcome such an injury. It takes a lot - a lot of time, patience, rehabilitation, hard work, and money. If someone else is at fault for your injury, we can get you the compensation you need to get your life back on track.

We not only have trial experience, but we also have experience in dealing with insurance companies. While we have the confidence to go to trial and argue your case (and we handle each case as if we will go to trial), we know that a trial is not always the best option. Sometimes, an alterative resolution is the best option for our clients. We will look at all options and help you decide what’s best for you.

Not all personal injury attorneys understand the intricacies and complications of spinal cord injuries. We know how trying it can be to deal with not only weakness or paralysis but also associated problems like autonomic dysreflexia, muscle plasticity, pressures sores, and depression. Through caring, aggressive representation, we will work to get you the compensation and resources you need to overcome such problems and go on with your life.

If your spinal cord injury was caused by the negligence of an individual or organization, then the guilty party should be held accountable for all costs involved, including past and future medical bills and related expenses. Whether you were injured in a motorcycle accident, auto accident, tractor trailer accident, construction accident, or another type of accident, if a negligent party is a fault, we will help you recover the compensation you need to cover for medical bills, lost wages, and skilled, reliable long-term care.

You don’t have to face the mounting bills and unknown future alone. We can help. We will stand up against the insurance companies and protect your rights to get the recovery you deserve. Call MLN Law at (404) 531-9700 to schedule your free consultation.

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Tuesday, May 26, 2009

  Slips, Trips, and Falls in Restaurants

Slips, trips, and falls are the most common cause of injury in restaurants among both employees and customers. Think about it . . . Beverages and grease splatter on the floor throughout day, and mopping can make the floor even more slippery. On top of that, simply walking around in most restaurants is an awkward and often dangerous task. The aisles between tables are typically narrow and cramped, and during busy times, servers scurry about carrying large trays of hot food. Considering the environment, it’s a miracle that more people aren’t injured by falling in restaurants.

Each year, three million workers and one million customers are injured due to slips, trips, and falls in restaurants. Slips, trips, and falls account for 27% of all workers’ compensation claims and 39% of all general liability claims in the restaurant industry. For slips, trips, and falls, the average general liability claim cost for restaurants is $3,550.

According to the National Safety Council, slips, trips, and falls are the single largest cause of Emergency Room visits. Sadly, slips and falls cause over 20,000 fatalities in North America each year, and slips and falls are a leading cause of death in the workplace (second only to traffic accident fatalities).

In restaurants, people commonly slip on spilled food and beverages, but may they also trip in pot hot holes in the parking lot, slip on snow or ice in the parking lot, or trip over furniture, floor displays, or other obstructions.

The National Restaurant Association reveals that slips and falls are the greatest source of general liability claims within the restaurant industry. Here are some tips for preventing slips and falls in restaurants as well as what to do if you fall:

Tips for Restaurant Employees:

- Make sure that mats and runners are in place in commonly slippery areas.

- Wear slip-resistant shoes.

- Clean up spills immediately, and mark the spill with a sign.

- Conduct frequent inspections of floors.

- Pay attention during safety training.

- Report all slips, trips, and falls to a manager immediately, even if you don’t think you’re injured.

- Get a copy of the incident report.

- Take note of witnesses.

- If you fall, use a quality cell phone camera or disposable camera to take photos of the scene. See your doctor as soon as possible.


Tips for Restaurant Guests:

- Immediately report any spills or floor hazards to a manager.

- Walk slowly and carefully, and keep your eye on fast-moving employees.

- Report all slips, trips, and falls immediately, even if you don’t think you’re injured. Insist on speaking to a manager, and insist that the manager give you a copy of a written incident report.

- If you fall in a restaurant, take photos of the area where you fell if you have a camera or good cell phone camera on you. If you don’t have a camera, borrow one or purchase a disposable camera.

- Write down the names and phone numbers of other people at the scene.

- See your doctor as soon as possible.

- Don’t sign anything unless your attorney reviews it first.

- If you get a call from an insurance claims adjustor, he or she will probably get you to admit fault or partial responsibility. Tell the claims adjustor that you’re represented by an attorney, and you do not have to comment.

The leading causes of falls in restaurants include poor design and layout, poor maintenance, spilled liquids, spilled food, poor housekeeping, and floor obstructions. Poor design may refer to slippery floor coverings, low light, or slopes in floors. Examples of poor maintenance include frayed carpet, broken lights, leaking sinks, untimely ice removal, and broken tables or chairs. Common floor obstructions include floor mats, displays and signs, and shrubbery.

If you’ve been injured due to a slip, trip, or fall in a restaurant, you may be entitled to a personal injury claim. Restaurant owners, managers, and supervisors have a duty to uphold safety standards and warn people about any potential hazards.

When you sustain a personal injury because of a slip, trip, or fall in a restaurant - or any kind of personal injury where another party may be liable - contact The Law Offices of Michael Lawson Neff as soon as possible. If you have any questions, call (404) 531-9700 to schedule your free consultation.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,


Thursday, January 8, 2009

  The agenda of Big Business

An interesting article by Andrew Cohen of CBS News.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/20/opinion/courtwatch/printable4679876.shtml

Made in America: Corporate Gall
Dec. 20, 2008
(CBS) Andrew Cohen

Like the child who kills his parents and then begs for mercy because he is an orphan, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce now is begging President-elect Barack Obama to protect corporate interests in the nation’s civil litigation system as a way of restoring jobs and bolstering an economy shattered largely (as we now know) by corporate greed and misfeasance.

Talk about your gall.

Here is what the president of the Chamber’s legal arm wrote in an open letter to Obama: “We understand the critical necessity of revitalizing the economy by restoring American jobs, encouraging the growth of U.S. businesses, and protecting the savings and investments of millions of Americans. However, we are concerned that the potential expansion of legal liability significantly impairs these much needed steps toward a national recovery.”

The quote may be roughly translated this way: “Now that corporate America has helped screw everything up and led us into the greatest economic crisis since the Depression, we need to make sure that corporate America isn’t aggressively punished for its misdeeds or legitimately thwarted from misdoing them again.”

This is either an astonishing hypocrisy - Is corporate America unaware that the rest of us are in on the secret of the causes of the recession? - or the clearest indication there can be that Big Business is, always has been, and always will be about protecting Big Business.

The Chamber has been pushing tirelessly for decades to rein in plaintiffs’ attorneys (who look to punish corporate negligence or fraud with civil lawsuits), deregulate industry and commerce (we all know how well Wall Street did with its freedom), and nullify important consumer protection laws (like the one in Maine which is allowing smokers to go after tobacco companies for false advertising). The lobbying effort has been national and local, highly-public and super-secret, and devastatingly successful.

Thanks in part to the Chamber and its Orwellian-named Institute for Legal Reform, the Securities and Exchange Commission backed off its scrutiny of screwy deals and schemes, the Congress was lax in its oversight of the mortgage industry, litigators were thwarted or punished, and the White House and Justice Department pushed a legal doctrine ("preemption") that almost always helped employers over employees.

All of these things, and more policies and practices endorsed by the Institute, helped unshackle the savageries of corporate America and left individuals less protected against an ever-freer and more predatory market.

Indeed, aside from the occasional Supreme Court decision that has helped the little guy, and the heroic efforts of states to help protect consumers and the environment, the history of our “litigation system” (as the Institute puts it) over the past 20 years is one of unremitting advances for the Chamber and its fellow travelers in law, politics and governance.

The Environmental Protection Agency has been reduced to a shadow of its former self so that polluters have gone unpunished, the Madoffs of the world have been nurtured and coddled and thus have flourished, and the brutal Savings and Loan crisis of the late 1980s has been made to look like a bake sale compared to the trillions of investment dollars lost and the hundreds of billions soon to be spent by our government.

Even the Web site for the Institute reads like a cruel parody. Not surprisingly, it does not highlight the personal stories of the millions of victims of corporate greed or managerial incompetence. It does not measure the number of lives saved, and fortunes protected, and pollution cleaned through these lawsuits. Instead, under the banner of “lawsuit abuse,” it tracks the lives of people who believe for one reason or another that they have been unfairly sued.

[Now, tell me, have you ever known someone who believed that he or she had just been fairly sued?]

Plaintiffs’ attorneys aren’t responsible for the mortgage-fueled economic meltdown. Class-action litigation isn’t, either. And don’t blame overzealous regulators or greedy employees who want better pay or conditions in their own factories. The people with whom the Chamber and the Institute do battle are not the people who invented or allowed the great pyramid schemes which brought down Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. They did not force consumers to spend more than they earned or save less than they should. Corporate America is directly responsible for what has just happened to corporate America, and if you don’t believe me, ask the folks at Ford, GM and Chrysler.

The economic meltdown came about because business interests were able to greatly decrease the vital tensions between industry and regulation, between oversell and oversight. And it will take the restoration of those tensions by government leaders not just to help bring us out of our slump but to help ensure that the next downturn doesn’t come again for a long time.

So it seems to me that the last things the Obama administration ought to do once it takes over is further shackle lawyers, or stifle well-meaning state laws, or make it easier for businesses to avoid liability and culpability for their actions.

The Chamber and the Institute want us to believe that one of the problems which created our misery also happens to be one of the solutions to it. They call it “reform.”

I call it nonsense.


Attorney Andrew Cohen analyzes legal issues for CBS News and CBSNews.com.

Labels: ,


Archives

February 2007   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   January 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010  

This page 

is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]