<
Michael Lawson Neff, P.C. | Atlanta Personal Injury Lawyers
PRACTICE AREAS
Michael Lawson Neff | Personal Injury Lawyer, Atlanta
Blog
Atlanta, Georgia Personal Injury Lawyer



Atlanta personal injury lawyer blog Thursday, March 11, 2010

  T. Marzetti Veggie Dips Recalled Over Salmonella Scare

Certain T. Marzetti Veggie Dips - also sold under the Oak Lake Chip Dips and Great Value Chip Dips labels - are currently being recalled due to a potential salmonella contamination. These vegetable dips are sold in a variety of supermarkets across Georgia.

Salmonella is a very dangerous food borne bacteria which is well known for being dangerous to people, and has been responsible for numerous cases of food poisoning. Symptoms include severe diarrhea, and especially in children or the elderly, it can lead to complications which pose serious health risks. While not normally fatal, salmonella is responsible for deaths every year within the United States.

Products being recalled include:

T. Marzetti Southwest Ranch Veggie Dip, 15.5- ounce (UPC 70200 52004) Best By dates: APR2010F, APR2810F, MAY1610F, MAY3110F, JUN0610F, JUN1410F, JUN1910F

T. Marzetti Fat Free Southwest Ranch Veggie Dip, 13- ounce (UPC 70200 52033) Best By dates: MAY1610F, MAY3010F, JUN0810F, JUN1210F, JUN2510F

T. Marzetti Spinach Veggie Dip, 15-ounce (UPC 70200 52059) Best By dates: APR1910F, MAY0910F, JUN0710F

Great Value Ranch Chip Dip, 16 ounce (UPC 78742 43099) Best By dates: 042810F, 050810F, 052910F, 053010F, 053110F, 060410F, 060510F, 061110F

The Great Value Ranch Chip Dip is mostly distributed through Walmart and Sam's Club, while the T. Marzetti varies are distributed widely through a variety of supermarket chains.

Consumers who have purchased these products should either discard them, or return them to the store where they were purchased for a refund. Because of the potential of salmonella poisoning, these products are possibly dangerous and should not be eaten. T. Marzetti can be contacted by those who have questions at: 800-427-0147

State Agriculture Commissioner Tommy Irvin's office announced this recall last week, hopefully before there could be serious consequences from the tainted food. I have written before about the damaging consequences of salmonella contamination and poisoning, and while this does not seem to be on the same scale as last year's peanut recall, it is still a serious recall. It would be a mistake to understate how greatly this disease can affect people's lives. Exposure to unclean food is one of the more common methods of contracting salmonella, along with exposure to contaminated water and exposure to feces.

If you or a loved one has been injured by a recalled or defective product, it is important contact a Georgia accident lawyer as soon as possible. You may be entitled to compensation. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: , , , , ,


Monday, February 15, 2010

  Undisclosed Allergens a Serious Threat

In the course of writing this blog, I have made it a point to pay attention to food and product recalls through various sources. Recently, while scanning this month's recalls on the U.S Food and Drug Administration's site, I noticed a troubling trend.

So far this month, the FDA has posted announcements of several separate incidents where known and potentially dangerous allergens were not disclosed on a product's packaging. I could say that we here in Georgia are lucky that none of the recalls are likely to affect us locally; however, two of these incidents involve products distributed in more than one state. In the case of the allergy alert which Pierino Frozen Foods Inc. issued on its Jumbo Shells with Cheese, the recalled product was sold in stores in Michigan, West Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Colorado, Texas, Kentucky, North Carolina, Virginia, and Florida - essentially across the entire country.

Pierino Frozen Foods Inc. failed to include eggs as a potential allergen on the Jumbo Shells with Cheese's packaging, putting people with allergies or intolerances to eggs in danger of reactions. So far, there has only been one confirmed allergic reaction to the undeclared eggs, thankfully mild, but this mistake could easily have resulted in a far more serious, potentially even fatal reaction in someone with severe allergies to egg.

Roughly 4 percent of adults in our country suffer from food allergies, and something like 6 to 8 percent of children. Food intolerances, which are less dangerous, are even more common. In people who have food allergies, exposure to even trace amounts of the allergen can result in an immune response. Symptoms of an allergic reaction could be from discomfort in the form of digestive problems or hives, to life threatening if the victim suffers from anaphylaxis.

Anaphylaxis is an allergic reaction which affects the whole body, and can cause a person's airways to constrict. Also called anaphylactic-shock, anaphylaxis is relatively rare, but exceptionally dangerous, especially if left untreated.

The FDA requires manufacturers to list warnings for some of the most common potential allergens. While people can develop allergies to nearly any food, potentially, a few common foods make up the vast majority of life threatening allergies in adults and children. These allergens include: peanuts, tree nuts, fish, shellfish, eggs, milk, wheat and soy. While it is not required by the FDA, many manufacturers also list potential allergens which other products may have come in contact with.

These precautions may seem extreme to people who do not themselves have experience with severe food allergies, however they can be life saving for people who live with them. The most effective treatment for these people is nothing less than entirely avoiding the food that they are allergic to, making clear labels and warnings nothing less than a manufacturer's responsibility to its consumers.

If you or a loved one has been injured by a recalled or defective product, contact a Georgia personal injury lawyer immediately. You may be entitled to compensation. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: , , , , ,


Thursday, February 4, 2010

  One Year after Georgia Peanut Corporation Salmonella Outbreak…

It’s been a year since we first heard about the contaminated peanut products from the Georgia-based Peanut Corporation of America. A recent article in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reminds us that the salmonella outbreak killed 9 people and sickened hundreds of people. But apparently the Peanut Corporation never accepted accountability for the outbreak.

After the outbreak, the Georgia state government and the federal government promised to “get tough” on food safety. But not much has happened since then. The Georgia Legislature passed a new law that mandated food testing regulations, but these new regulations have not been worked out. Lawmakers in Washington D.C. seem to have forgotten about the food safety legislation that’s currently sitting in Congress.

Criminal investigations into the Peanut Corporation have fizzled out. No charges were ever filed against executives even though evidence suggested that they knowingly sent out contaminated products.

The salmonella outbreak linked to peanuts from the Georgia plant started in late 2008 and went on to kill at least 9 people. The Blakely plant in Georgia was shut down.

The Peanut Corporation is now bankrupt, and part of the $12 million insurance settlement connected to the bankruptcy will go to about 100 victims of the outbreak. However, the victims have not received anything so far. Other lawsuits against other companies that used the peanuts are pending.

Jeff Almer’s mother died after eating contaminated peanut butter from the Peanut Corporation. He is stunned at the lack of action; “Nothing’s happened. It’s very frustrating.”

Many experts are worried that as time passes, the chance of food safety reform gets smaller.

However, Michael Doyle of the food safety center at the University of Georgia suggests that state officials are still working on the legislation.

“I’ve learned to be patient,” said Doyle. “To get it right.”

In the meantime, recalls continue to roll in because of contaminated food products. Recently pine nuts and hazel nuts were recalled because of salmonella, and peanut butter has been recalled because of the bacteria listeria.

Attorney Bill Marler, who is handling lawsuits for about 45 victims of the salmonella outbreak, finds it hard to believe that criminal charges have not been filed against Peanut Corporation executives: “In 17 years of litigating every major food-borne illness outbreak in the U.S., I have not seen a clearer situation that demanded criminal prosecution.”

If you’d like to see something done about food safety in Georgia, contact your legislators and let them know how you feel.

If you’ve been injured by a toxic, contaminated or defective product, contact an experienced Georgia personal injury lawyer immediately. You may be entitled to compensation. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, February 3, 2010

  Children’s Disney Jewelry Recalled

Parents should be aware of two recent recalls of children’s jewelry products. Wal-Mart has recalled 55,000 Disney “Princess and Frog” necklaces that were sold exclusively at Wal-Mart stores. This recall was announced on Friday.

The necklaces contain high levels of cadmium, which can to toxic to children if ingested. Cadmium is a known carcinogen (cancer-causing agent) and may cause fever, developmental problems, or even death in high amounts.

The recalled metal chain link necklaces have pendants shaped like a crown or a frog. The packaging reads “Disney” and “The Princess and the Frog.” Recalled necklace model numbers include 4616-4187 (crown pendant) and 4616-4190 (frog pendant). The recalled Disney necklaces were sold at Wal-Mart stores across the country between November 2009 and January 2010. Average retail price was five dollars. If your child has one of these necklaces, return it to Wal-Mart for a refund.

In a related recall, 426,000 pieces of Disney children’s jewelry have been recalled due to high levels of lead. The recalled pieces include the “Tiny Tink” Tinkerbell charms as well as children’s bracelets sold through Papyrus Greeting Cards. This recall was announced by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) on Tuesday. Both jewelry products were imported.

The Tinkerbell charms were imported by Playmates Toys. Researchers discovered that a metal piece of the charm had excess levels of lead. The Papyrus bracelets were imported by Schurman Fine Papers, and researchers found that the lead paint on the bracelets contained high levels of lead. Both of these pieces of children’s jewelry violated the federal standard for lead paint.

Over 252,000 Tiny Tink charms were recalled. The following Disney toy jewelry products were recalled: Tinker Bell’s Lil’ Tinker Bracelet, Rosetta’s Rosebud Keychain, Silvermist’s Water Lily Necklace. The Disney toys were sold at several retailers across the country from November 2008 to November 2009. Prices ranged from six dollars to eight dollars.

The Papyrus bracelets and greeting cards were sold from February 2004 to September 2009 at various retail stores for around seven dollars. If ingested, high levels of lead in paint could lead to nerve damage, brain damage, mental retardation, developmental problems, seizures, and even death. Low levels of lead exposure may also cause developmental problems for children.

If you own any of these jewelry toys, return them for a refund.

Toy jewelry is notorious for containing high levels of lead, cadmium, and other toxins. It’s best to avoid toy jewelry altogether, especially if it’s imported from China. China has a history of producing toys contaminated with lead paint and other toxins.

To be safe, teach your children to avoid chewing on toys and to wash their hands regularly, especially after playing outdoors. Soil is often contaminated with lead, especially if it’s near a roadway (thanks to a history of lead in gasoline).

If your child has been injured by an unsafe toy, contact an experienced Atlanta, Georgia personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. You may be entitled to compensation. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: , , ,


Monday, February 1, 2010

  Recall Causes Unexpected Consequences for Toyota Owners

Facing the recent massive recall of Toyotas, Atlanta Toyota owners find themselves at something of a loss.

Toyota has said that their cars are still fit to drive and those using them have no need to worry about the recall which has suspended production at six of their assembly plants, but that provides little relief for owners who have had no luck finding out when they will be able to bring their cars in for repairs, or even what those repairs might be when that time finally arrives.

"I called the dealership this morning after I heard about it and they told me they had not even received information or parts to repair what the problem is," said Joyce Stevenson, a Newnan resident who drives a 2007 Camry LE, V-6, 4-door sedan.

"Well, if it’s serious enough for them to stop selling them, then why aren’t they in a hurry to get the parts to fix them for people who have already bought one?"

Unanswered questions and worries over the recall are even starting to create division in some families as loyalists clash with those who want to get rid of the recalled cars and avoid Toyota in the future after learning of their widespread defect.

On the one hand, Toyota is expected to weather this recall well in the long run mostly on the grounds of their robust and loyal base of consumers. Many owners will stick with their Toyotas through the ups and downs brought by this recall and continue to buy Toyota automobiles in the future. Duncan Harle would like to be such a customer, but his wife falls on the other side of the argument. Sharon is firm in her stance that they get something else for their next car.

"We’re going to buy a new car," she said. "I can’t trust this car."

Duncan has been a Toyota owner longer than his wife, and calls them the best cars he's owned. For him, waiting and seeing how the recall and repairs continue seems like the best course of action.

"Can we bring the car in for a recall, and if we bring it in, what can they do for us?" Harle said. "I’ll give them a chance to fix it."

And in the short term, at least, economics may favor the loyalists. While dealers understand that these things do not permanently affect the ability to resell these cars once the proper repairs have been made, it may still make them cautious when making offers to sell or trade in the affected models. Private buyers will probably be even more conservative toward buying them, since they are less savvy of how much the cars will still be worth once repair, or because they might see the opportunity to get a better deal. Experts recommend that sellers hold onto their Toyotas at least a few more weeks and see what happens rather than accept a lower price.

If you've been injured by a defective product, contact an experienced Atlanta, GA personal injury lawyer immediately. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Thursday, January 28, 2010

  Toyota Recall Continues to Grow

The massive Toyota recall due to a faulty accelerator pedal continues to grow. Today the company announced that the recall will extend to Europe and China. This makes one wonder just how many drivers are currently in danger. Nearly 100,000 vehicles will be recalled in China, and an undisclosed number of vehicles will be recalled in Europe. Some speculate that as many as 2 million Toyotas may be recalled in Europe.

Toyota recently recalled over a million vehicles in the U.S. because of the accelerator pedal problem. The pedal can get stuck and cause the vehicles to suddenly accelerate. This problem has reportedly caused four deaths in the U.S. To clarify: Toyota says that the problem has not caused any injuries or deaths, but ABC News has linked the problem to four deaths.

The recent recall is in addition to an earlier November 2009 recall of 4.3 million Toyota and Lexus vehicles. At the time of the original recall, the company blamed the accelerator problem on floor mats. Now they admit that there is a mechanical problem with the accelerator.

Earlier this week USA Today reported that Toyota knew about the accelerator problem last year - but they didn't know how to repair it. In fact, they still don't know how to fix the problem. Toyota has halted production at six plants in North America.

"I think it's questionable" whether the two Toyota recalls actually address separate issues, said Jesse Toprak of TrueCar.com. "Their biggest error was not to do a deep dive into the issue last year."

Right now, nobody knows has this problem will be resolved? Will dealers be able to repair the problem? Will they be able to offer loaner cars in the interim? According to Toyota, the problem appears to stem from premature wear in the throttle assembly. Drivers have reported that the pedal can stick in place even after they remove their foot.

Approximately 5.9 Toyota vehicles have now been recalled. Looking on the bright side, perhaps this issue will boost sales for American-made cars.

Atlanta car dealer Jim Ziegler said, "Toyota has got the resources to bounce back from this, but this is the biggest crisis that they have ever faced, and Ford and Hyundai and others are coming on strong."

Recalled Toyota vehicles include:

2005-2010 Toyota Avalon large sedan
2007-2010 Toyota Camry
2009-2010 Toyota Corolla
2008-2010 Toyota Highlander
2010 Toyota Highlander crossover
2009-2010 Toyota Matrix hatchback
2009-2010 Toyota RAV4
2008-2010 Toyota Sequoia large SUV
2007-2010 Toyota Tundra pickup
2009-2010 Toyota Venza
2009-2010 Pontiac Vibe

If you own one of these vehicles, contact the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331.

If you find yourself behind the wheel of a runaway Toyota, pumping the breaks may not help. Shift the vehicle into neutral, and shut off the engine. Don't take any chances.

If you've been injured by a defective product, contact an experienced Atlanta, GA personal injury lawyer immediately. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: , , ,


Tuesday, January 26, 2010

  Monetary Incentive for Dangerous Crib Recalls?

Bloomberg reports that the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is considering requiring crib manufacturers to provide consumers with refunds or monetary incentives when dangers cribs are recalled. Crib recalls usually involve a free repair kit, but many parents never contact the manufacturer to receive the free repair kit. CPSC Chairman Inez Tenenbaum says that refunds or monetary incentives such as store credits may increase response rates to recalls.

“Such a requirement would certainly incentivize many consumers to discard and replace defective cribs,” Tenenbaum told a House Energy and Commerce Committee panel. Tenenbaum said that lawmakers should consider requiring companies to offer refunds or store credits.

Since 2007, more than 7 million dangerous cribs have been recalled. However, many of these cribs are still being used. Even worse, many of the recalled cribs are still being sold in secondary markets.

In November 2009, 2.1 million cribs made by Stork Craft manufacturing were recalled. It was the biggest crib recall ever. The recall was instigated only after the death of four infants in the United States. The drop-side cribs posed a danger of infants being trapped.

Just last week, more dangerous crib recalls were announced. Dorel Asia cribs were recalled due to strangulation and suffocation hazards. These cribs also have a drop-side that can potentially trap infants. Dorel Asia has received 31 reports of drop-side incidents, including six cases where children were trapped. The recalled Dorel Asia cribs, manufactured in China and Vietnam, were sold at K-Mart, Sears, and Wal-Mart stores between January 2005 and December 2009 for $120 to $700. Dorel Asia cribs with the following model numbers were recalled: WM1633, WM1633-0, WM1676BC, WM1676BCR-DC, WM2163, WM2163DC, WM1633-0-DC, GP004B3EGR, GP004B3WGR, GP006BCEGR, GP006BCWGR, DA1615B3, DAKM5132, DASE5005, DASE5009, DA0504KMC-1N, DA0504KMC-1W, DA1614B3, DAKM5152, and DASE5015. If you have one of these cribs, stop using it immediately and call Dorel Asis at 1-866-762-2304 to receive a free repair kit. You can also visit dorel-asia.com for more information about this recall.

Drop-side cribs made by Caramina Furniture were also recently recalled. The recalled Caramina "Diana" drop-side cribs were sold at Buy Buy Baby and mass merchandise stores from September 2002 through December 2005 for $240 to $370. For more information about this recall, contact Caramina Furniture at 1-877-728-0342.

The CPSC now has a Crib Information Center to provide information about all of the crib recalls.

I certainly hope that lawmakers decide to require crib makers to offer some type of monetary incentive for recalls. Frankly, if I owned a crib that had been recalled due to strangulation hazards, I would want a full refund. A simple repair kit would not put my mind at ease! Additionally, because of all these recalls, I would not trust any drop-side cribs. There is an inherent design flaw in the safety of these cribs.

If you're a parent or children's caregiver, please review these crib safety tips from the CPSC:

To prevent suffocation, never place pillows or thick quilts in a baby’s sleep environment. Also, make sure there are no gaps larger than two fingers between the sides of the crib and the mattress.

Proper assembly of cribs is paramount - Follow the instructions provided and make sure that every part is installed correctly. If you are not sure, call the manufacturer for assistance.

Do not use old, broken or modified cribs - Infants can strangle to death if their bodies pass through gaps between loose components or broken slats while their heads remain entrapped.

Properly set up play yards according to manufacturers' directions. Only use the mattress pad provided with the play yard; do not add extra padding.

Never place a crib near a window with blind or curtain cords; babies can strangle on curtain or blind cords.


Have any of you parents out there had a bad experience with drop-side cribs? If so, please leave a comment and let others know.

Labels: , ,


Monday, January 25, 2010

  Toyota Expands Recall for Sudden Acceleration Problem

Back in November, I questioned the effectiveness of Toyota's limited recall in the post Will Toyota Recall Solve the Acceleration Problem?

Toyota had blamed the heavily publicized sudden acceleration problem on floor mats that caused the gas pedal to stick. However, several consumers said that the acceleration in their Toyota had not been caused by the floor mat. For example, Elizabeth James, whose Toyota Prius suddenly accelerated to 90 MPH, said that her foot was not even on the gas pedal: "I'm absolutely certain that in my situation, it was not the floor mats."

Last week Toyota finally admitted that the sudden acceleration problems could not be caused by floor mats alone and announced a recall of 2.3 million vehicles.

“In recent months, Toyota has investigated isolated reports of sticking accelerator pedal mechanisms in certain vehicles without the presence of floor mats,” said Toyota Motor Sales Vice President Irv Miller. “Our investigation indicates that there is a possibility that certain accelerator pedal mechanisms may, in rare instances, mechanically stick in a partially depressed position or return slowly to the idle position.”

Apparently, wear and tear may cause the pedal sensor assembly to malfunction and possibly get stuck while engaged. Obviously, a stuck accelerator pedal that causes sudden acceleration will increase the risk of crash and injury.

Recalled vehicles include the 2009 Pontiac Vibe, 2005 to 2010 Toyota Avalon, 2007 to 2010 Toyota Camry, 2009 to 2010 Toyota Corolla, 2009 to 2010 Toyota Corolla Matrix, 2010 Toyota Highlander, 2009 to 2010 Toyota RAV4, 2008 to 2010 Toyota Sequoia, and 2007 to 2010 Toyota Tundra.

This recall of 2.3 million vehicles is separate from the previous recall of 4.2 Toyota and Lexus vehicles with defective floor mats. At the time of the previous recall, Toyota representatives denied that a mechanical problem might be behind the incidences of sudden acceleration. After the recall, ABC News aired a story which reported on 60 new cases of runaway Toyotas after the recall.

Toyota representatives have not said how the company plans to repair defective accelerator pedals. Simply replacing the part with another defective part would not remedy the situation. If you have one of the affected Toytoa vehicles listed above, call Toyota at 1-800-331-4331 for more information. You can also find more information at www.safecar.gov.

If you have one of the recalled vehicles, you should stop driving it until it is repaired. The sudden acceleration problem has caused several deaths. If you find yourself behind the wheel of a runaway Toyota, shift the car into neutral and firmly apply the brakes, including the emergency brake.

If you have been injured in an auto accident due to a defective part, contact an experienced Atlanta auto accident attorney immediately. You may be entitled to compensation. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: , , , ,


Friday, January 22, 2010

  Lysol Steam Mop Recalled over Burn Hazard

Lysol Steam Mop Recall

This week the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a voluntary recall of approximately 162,000 Lysol Steam Cleaning Mops made by the Conair Corporation of Stamford, Connecticut. The recall was issued after it was realized that hot water can rupture the housing of the steam mop and pose a burn hazard as it shoots out. Additionally, the ruptured housing unit may pose a laceration hazard.

Conair has received at least 14 reports of hot water forcefully shooting out of the water reservoir of the Lysol steam mop. These reports included two minor burn injuries which required the consumers to seek medical attention.

The recall applies to the Lysol Steam Cleaning Mop by Conair, model numbers SM10L and SM10LR. The model number appears on the bottom of the mop beneath the microfiber cloth. The recalled steam mops were sold at many different department stores, drug stores, hardware stores, home improvement stores, Internet stores, and mass merchandisers across the country between September 2006 and September 2009. The steam mops sold for approximately $40. They were made in China.

If you have a Conair Lysol Steam Mop with model number SM10L or SM10LR, stop using the mop immediately to avoid possible burn injury. Contact Conair at 1-800-687-6916 during normal business hours or visit www.conair.com/recallmop to receive your free replacement steam cleaning mop.

If you ever need to report a dangerous product or product-related injury, you can call the CPSC Hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Thermador Oven Recall

In related product recall news, BSH Home Appliance Corporation has expanded its recall on Thermador built-in ovens. The ovens may overheat in self-cleaning mode and cause fires. There have been reports of fires that have damaged surrounding cabinets. Approximately 37,000 Thermador ovens have been recalled. No injuries have been reported so far, but if you have a Thermador built-in oven with one of the following model numbers, please stop using it immediately: C272B, C302B, SEC272, SEC302, SECD272 and SECD302. The retail prices of these ovens ranged from $3,000 to $4,400. For additional information, contact Thermador at 1-800-701-5230 or visit www.thermador.com.

Horizon Fitness Elliptical Trainer Recall - LIVESTRONG Fitness Elliptical Trainer Recall

Horizon Fitness and LIVESTRONG Fitness Elliptical Trainers distributed by Johnson Health Tech North American have also been recalled. The foot pedal on these elliptical trainers can disengage and pose a fall hazard. No injuries have been reported so far, but 58 foot pedal problems have been reported. Approximately 18,000 elliptical trainers were recalled. For more information, contact Johnson Health Tech North America at 1-800-962-3596, or visit www.horizonfitness.com or www.livestrongfitness.com.

Defective Product Injury in Atlanta, GA

Have you been seriously injured by a defective, unsafe product? If so, contact an experienced Atlanta, Georgia personal injury attorney immediately. You may be entitled to compensation. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation to discuss your legal rights.

Labels: , ,




  Atlanta Company Graco Recalls Baby Strollers



Atlanta-based company Graco Children's Products has recalled about 1.5 baby strollers due to fingertip amputation and laceration hazards. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced the recall on Wednesday. According to the CPSC, consumers should stop using the recalled products immediately. Recalled products included strollers and travel systems with the names Graco's Passage, Alano, and Spree.

The CPSC reports that the hinges on the strollers may cause fingertip cuts or even amputation to a child when the canopy of the stroller is opened or closed. Graco has received seven reports of child injuries because of the stroller's canopy hinge. In five of the cases, the child's fingertip was amputated. According to Fox News, this is the largest stroller recall ever.

The following model numbers of Graco baby strollers have been recalled: 6303MYC, 6303MYC3 7240DNB, 7240DNB2, 7240MKL2, 7240MKL3, 7F02GLM3, 6320IVY, 6320LAU 7241DDH2, 7241DHO3, 7F04TAY3 6330CAP, 6330THR, 6330THR3 7255CLP, 7255CLP2, 7255CRA2, 7255CRA3, 7255CSA3, 7255GPK3, 7255GRN, 7255GRN2, 7255JJB3, 7255ORC2, 7255WLO2, 7255WLO3, 7F07EMA3, 6F00QIN3, 6F00RRY3, 7256CLO2, 7256SPM2, 7256SPM3, 7F08DSW3, 7F08LAN3 6F03GLN3 7260BAN, 7260BAN2, 7260BAN3, 7260MRA2, 7260MRA3, 7260PKR, 7260PKR2, 7G00DLS3, 7G00DLS4, 6G10CSE3, 7270BIA, 7270BIA2 7G01CRL3, 7235GGA, 7235GGA2 7E01JON2, 7E01JON3, 7G04KRA3, 7236CDR2 7F00LPE3, 7F00RSH3, 7G05GPR3, 7G06WSR3 7237HOL2, 7237HOL3 7F01FOR3 7G07ABB3, 7G07BAT3.

Only strollers with a plastic, jointed hinge mechanism with indented canopy notches were included in the recall. (Graco also manufactures strollers with a different type of hinge mechanism). The recalled strollers were made between October 2004 and February 2008. If you have a Graco stroller, you can find the model number and manufacturing date on the lower interior part of the rear frame, above the rear wheels. The recalled strollers and travel systems were sold at several retailers including AAFES, Burlington Coat Factory, Babies R Us, Toys R Us, Kmart, Fred Meyer, Meijers, Navy Exchange, Sears, Target, and Walmart between October 2004 and December 2009 for prices ranging from $80 to $200. The strollers were manufactured in China.

A statement from Graco reads: "At Graco, safety is always our top priority. We have determined that some of the canopies on select Passage™, Alano™, and Spree™ model strollers, manufactured by Graco prior to March 2008, could expose children to a risk of injury. We have issued a voluntary recall of these products. No other Graco strollers are affected by this notice. For consumers who have an affected stroller, Graco will provide a free canopy hinge cover, which can be ordered below for consumers in the US."

If you have one of the recalled strollers, stop using it immediately and call Graco to get your free protective cover hinge repair kit. You can call Graco at 1-800-345-4109 during normal business hours. You may also visit www.gracobaby.com for more information.

To report a dangerous product or product-related injury, call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772. Also contact an Atlanta personal injury lawyer, as you may have grounds to file a lawsuit. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: , ,


Thursday, January 21, 2010

  FDA Finally Issues BPA Warning for Parents

Last week I wrote about BPA health problems. Perhaps someone at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration noticed my post. After years of denying the dangers associated with BPA, the FDA has finally issued a subtle warning.

According to a report from CBS News, the FDA still claims that BPA is safe but now has "some concern" about the "subtle effects" of BPA on the "brain, behavior and prostate glands in fetuses, infants and young children."

Does that seem odd to anyone else but me? If this chemical can cause developmental problems for children, then how can the FDA say that it is still safe?

For now, the FDA is merely encouraging parents to limit children's exposure to BPA. BPA (bisphenol-A) is found in thousands of different products. It's typically added to plastic to make the plastic harder. As CBS News points out, concerned parents and scientists have been warning about the association between BPA and cancer, diabetes, and other health problems for years. The FDA is just now admitting that there might be a problem. However, in my opinion, the FDA is not doing enough to protect Americans from this dangerous chemical.

Of course, Linda Harrison of the American Chemistry Council would disagree with me.

"What's important to remember is that FDA indicated that the BPA has not been proven harmful to children or adults," said Harrison. "And that if they believed it was unsafe, they would've issued stronger regulations."

The real problem here is that chemicals are unleashed on the market and then must be "proven harmful." Wouldn't it make more sense to prove the safety of chemicals before allowing them to be sold? Of course, that would make more sense. But that would also cut into profits for chemical manufacturers.

CBS News correspondent Kelly Wallace demonstrated how one might ingest BPA on the Early Show. After eating a sandwich made from canned tuna, the BPA level in her blood was five times higher than normal. However, after living a BPA-free life for five days, the BPA levels in her blood were much lower than average. Wallace led a BPA-free life by avoiding all foods and drinks in cans or plastic containers. Plastic water bottles, for example, also contain BPA. Glass water bottles are a safe alternative.

Professor Fred Vom Saal of the University of Missouri said, "I and other colleagues of mine at an NIH (National Institutes of Health) meeting said, with a very high level of confidence, we think Bisphenol A is a threat to human health."

BPA causes problems by mimicking hormones like estrogen. This disrupts the balance of the endocrine system in the body.

Currently, it's nearly impossible to avoid all BPA. You can start by avoiding canned food. BPA is in the plastic lining of the cans. Also avoid food and beverages that come in plastic containers. When possible, buy glass instead of plastic. Remember, it's especially important to reduce BPA exposure for children and expectant mothers.

If you develop serious health problems that you believe to be connected to your use of a defective or unsafe product, contact a Georgia personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. You may be entitled to compensation. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700.

Labels: ,




  Baby Food Recalled

The Georgia Department of Agriculture announced last week that some baby food products are being recalled as a result of packaging defects.

The Agriculture Commissioner's office in a release which came out last week that the danger was in certain HAPPYTOT Stage 4 and HAPPYBABY Stage 1 and Stage 2 pouch meal products made by Nurture Inc., a New York based producer. These products could possibly have defects in their packaging which allows the pouches to swell or leak. Improperly sealed pouches, either swollen or leaking, could result in their contents being exposed to bacteria. Obviously, exposure to bacteria means that any children who eat this baby food might run the risk of food borne illness.

All of the meals being recalled are packaged in plastic pouches with plastic with plastic caps, and bear expiration dates between November 2010 and January 2011.

Products being recalled include:

• Green bean, pear & peas, NET WT. 4.22 OZ. (120g), UPC 8 52697 00127 9;
• Sweet potato, carrot, apple & cinnamon, NET WT. 4.22 OZ. (120g), UPC 8 52697 00128 6;
• Spinach, mango & pear, NET WT. 4.22 OZ. (120g), UPC 8 52697 00129 3;
• Butternut squash & apple, NET WT. 4.22 OZ. (120g), UPC 8 52697 00130 9;
• Banana, peach, coconut & prunes, NET WT. 4.22 OZ. (120g), UPC 8 52697 00131 6;
• Banana, peach & mango, NET WT. 4.22 OZ. (120g), UPC 8 52697 00132 3
• Mango, NET WT. 3.5 OZ. (99g), UPC 8 52697 00134 7
• Spinach Mango Pear, NET WT. 3.5 OZ. (99g), UPC 8 52697 00139 2
• Apricot Sweet Potato, NET WT. 3.5 OZ. (99g), UPC 8 52697 00136 1

Customers who purchased these products should contact Nurture Inc. this week for an exchange or refund. They can be called at 212-374-2779

Baby food recalls may seem even more dangerous and horrifying than other tainted food scares, since parents trust baby food makers to be particularly sensitive to the fact that their target consumers will be feeding them to very young children who have more delicate needs than adults, and who are less capable of understanding and communicating when they are seriously ill. Parents are often times more protective of their children than they are of themselves. This sort of event is not uncommon, though. Last fall saw a recall of Plum Organics baby food, and a failed attempt to initiate a recall on Gerber brand baby foods. It is not only the responsibility of parents to provide the best care they can for their children, but also the responsibility of the corporations that they trust to meet the high standards which society demands for care for children.

If you or someone you love has been injured as the result of a faulty defective product, it is important to talk to an experienced lawyer as soon as possible. Call (404) 531-9700 to schedule your free consultation at MLN Law.

Labels: , , ,


Wednesday, January 13, 2010

  Man Sues Hewlett Packard over Laptop Fire

The Boston Globe reports that John Norrie has filed a lawsuit against Hewlett-Packard Co. The lawsuit, filed in Plymouth Superior Court in Massachusetts and transferred to U.S. District Court, seeks $225,000 in damages.

The lawsuit claims that Norrie’s HP laptop overhead and started a fire that destroyed his home while he was sleeping. Norrie also suffered serious injuries while escaping from the burning house. According to the lawsuit, the laptop, which had been received as a gift six months prior to the fire, was a defective product.

The suit states that Hewlett Packard was “negligent with respect to its manufacture, sale, instructors, and/or distribution of the subject laptop which was defective or was otherwise unfit for use by consumers.”

Neither Norrie, his attorney, nor the attorney for Hewlett Packard could be reached for comment before the articles was published.

Hewlett Packard has recalled its lithium-ion laptop batteries on four different occasions since 2005. Consumers were able to receive replacement batteries with each recall. Other laptop manufacturers like Apple, Dell and Compaq have also recalled laptop batteries in recent years because were prone to overheating.

Laptop battery fires have led to several deaths and injuries. Last year a 56-year-old Canadian was killed after his laptop burst into flames in his home. The computer had been sitting on the man’s couch. After this incident, Canadian officials warned consumers that laptop computers should not be placed on soft furniture such as couches because the laptop’s ventilation system may be blocked, and this can cause overheating. When using your laptop, you should make sure that the vents are not blocked. If you begin to feel increased heat from your laptop, shut it down. Overheating may also be caused by internal problems with the batteries and computer designs.

In the video below, you can see a laboratory demonstration of a lithium ion laptop battery fire. If your laptop bursts into flames, move away from the computer quickly. More explosions will likely occur. Laptop fires typically start a chain reaction of battery cell explosions inside the computer. With each explosion, the laptop burns hotter. Do not use water to try to put out laptop battery fires. These are electrical, chemical fires, and it’s best to use a fire extinguisher.



If you've been injured by an exploding laptop or any defective product, contact an experienced Atlanta personal injury attorney today. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule your free consultation.

Labels: , ,


Thursday, January 7, 2010

  Massive Roman Shade and Blind Recall

The Consumer Product Safety Commission announced a recall of some 50 million shades and blinds last month, due to the safety risk they pose to young children.

The government safety regulators have recalled all roll-up blinds and all Roman shades in homes with small children. The problem in this recall is the cords – these blinds all feature cords which a child can easily become trapped in and potentially be strangled to death.

Since 2001, there have been eight reported deaths and sixteen more near strangulations involving the cords of window coverings.

Strangulation can occur when a child becomes trapped between the inner cords which control the binds, or when the cord becomes wrapped around the child’s neck. In the case of roll-up blinds, strangulation can occur when the child becomes tangled in the lifting loop. In both cases, the window coverings have exposed cords which pose the danger.

"Parents need to understand that these are hidden dangers, that a child can get entangled or strangled on these cords very quickly," said CPSC Chairman Inez Tenenbaum.

To illustrate the point, consider Collier Ursprung. The eighteen month old’s parents thought he was asleep in his crib, until the moment they heard a scream from his room.

"We scurried across the room to find him standing in his crib with the cord from the shade near his bed wrapped around his neck and he was unable to get out of it, and was struggling and tugging to get out of it," said Collier's father.

The boy’s father, Robert Ursprung, is a pediatrician. He managed to free his son and see to him immediately, and while the boy survived, it was very clear that the family had suffered from a close call.

Collier's mother, Susan Ursprung, will never forget the sight of the ligature marks the cord left in her son’s neck.

This is not the first time the CPSC has issued warnings and recalls about blinds. In fact, the organization has announced so many recalls that they are considering simply calling for a new mandatory redesign for children’s safety.

The CPSC recommends window coverings without cords for all homes with young children, or which young children regularly visit. It is impossible for parents to monitor their children constantly, and most parents do not realize just how quickly tragedies can happen. It only takes a few minutes for children to be seriously injured or killed.

In the short term, the CPSC advises that homes with these dangerous window coverings remove them, and keep them away from cribs or furniture which could serve to give young children access to cords. Special attention should be paid to keeping dangerous cords well out of reach.

Consumers who have Roman or roll-up shades in their homes should contact the Window Covering Safety Council immediately at www.windowcoverings.org or by calling (800) 506-4636 anytime to receive a free repair kit to make the window coverings safe.

For more information, visit the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission’s Web site.

Labels: , ,


Tuesday, January 5, 2010

  Father Sues Amby Baby Bed Maker Over Infant Death

amby baby hammock recall

Last month I alerted you about the Amby baby hammock recall. Now a father in Oregon has filed suit against Amby Baby USA, maker over the hammock-style baby beds.

Jonathan Kuzma of Gresham, OR filed the lawsuit in Moltnomah County Circuit Court and claimed that the defective and dangerous Amby baby bed led to the suffocation death of his son Matteo in August 2009.

The Amby Baby Motion Bed also led to the death of a 4-month-old baby in Georgia. The four-month-old girl was from Lawrenceville, GA, and she died in June 2009.

On December 8, 2008, a recall was issued for about 24,000 of the baby hammocks. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) warned that the side-to-side tilting of the hammock could cause a baby to become trapped within the fabric or mattress pad and suffocate.

Amby has not yet responded to calls or emails seeking comment about the lawsuit.

The lawsuit claims that Amby created a hammock with an unstable sleeping surface that creates a suffocation risk. The lawsuit also states that the materials used to manufacture the hammock were not sufficiently “breathable.”

The recalled Amby Baby Motion beds were sold between January 2003 and October 2009. They consist of a steel from and a fabric hammock connected by a large spring and a metal crossbar. The label on the bed says: “Amby - Babies Love It, Naturally.”

The CPSC warns consumers to stop using the hammocks immediately and contact the company for a free repair kit. In the meantime, if you have one of those baby hammocks, find another safe place for your infant to sleep.

For additional information about the Amby Baby hammock recall, you can call Amby Baby USA at 1-866-544-9721 or visit www.ambybaby.com. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772 to reported a dangerous product or product-related injury, or visit www.cpsc.gov for more information.

Is your baby’s sleeping area safe? Review the following tips from the National Institute of Child Development.

Always place your baby on his or her back to sleep, for naps and at night. The back sleep position is the safest, and every sleep time counts.

Place your baby on a firm sleep surface, such as on a safety-approved crib mattress, covered by a fitted sheet. Never place your baby to sleep on pillows, quilts, sheepskins, and other soft surfaces.

Keep soft objects, toys, and loose bedding out of your baby's sleep area. Don't use pillows, blankets, quilts, sheepskins, and pillow-like crib bumpers in your baby's sleep area, and keep any other items away from your baby's face.

Keep your baby's sleep area close to, but separate from, where you and others sleep. Your baby should not sleep in a bed or on a couch or armchair with adults or other children, but he or she can sleep in the same room as you. If you bring your baby in bed with you to breastfeed, put him or her back in a separate sleep area, such as a bassinet, crib, cradle, or a bedside cosleeper (infant bed that attaches to an adult bed) when finished.

Labels: , , ,


Wednesday, December 30, 2009

  Tire Blowout Kills Two on I-20 in Atlanta

Two people were killed last week and an additional four were injured in a single car accident. The accident temporarily closed I-20 eastbound lanes.

The accident was caused when a tire on the vehicle, a 2003 Ford Explorer, blew out and caused it to flip several times. Three of the Explorers six passengers were thrown out of the vehicle entirely.

Adriana Gil, twenty-nine, and Rocia Jimenez, also twenty-nine, both died in the accident. Both young women were from Forest Park. The other four victims were rushed to receive medical attention; their identities have not been released.

Tire blowouts are not uncommon, and can lead to very dangerous accidents, as demonstrated before on this blog when I wrote about the infamous Firestone Tire Recall. A rapid loss of air pressure in the tire – in that case due to tread separation – can easily lead to a total loss of control or a rollover when driving at speed.

How can you avoid a tire blowout or a rollover?

Unfortunately, there is no sure fire way to avoid either. Even safe drivers who properly maintain their tires can find themselves in a circumstance where one of their tires blows as a result of debris in the road, a pothole or in some cases, defective tires. There are, however, things you as a driver can do to minimize your chances of a serious blowout or rollover, and to protect yourself if the worst comes to pass.

First, check your tires regularly to insure that they have proper traction and are properly inflated. Properly maintaining your tires will help prevent a blowout in the first place.

Do not immediately hit the breaks if one of your tires loses pressure. If possible, maintain your speed until the car stabilizes – this will help your car’s traction. Only after the car stabilizes should you slow down and pull over to the side of the road.

Most rollovers occur on rural roads and highways, so exercise particular caution on these roads. Keeping two hands on the wheel and staying alert will help you avoid obstacles which could potentially cause a blowout or rollover, and ensures that you will be more likely to respond appropriately if something does go wrong.

Secure heavy cargo inside your car tightly, so it will not transform into a projectile in the event of a rollover.

And, of course, avoid driving at excessive speed.

The most common reason why people lose control of their cars is because they are under the influence of drugs or alcohol, they are tired, or they are otherwise distracted by talking on their cell phones or sending text messages. I’ve mentioned the perils of distracted driving on this blog many times, but, of course, distracted driving will always be one of our major problems on the road.

In the event the worst come to pass, remember that you should always be wearing your safety belt. Passengers wearing seatbelts are significantly more likely to survive a rollover crash than those who are unbelted.

If you or a loved one has been injured in a car accident, contact an experienced Georgia accident lawyer as soon as possible to protect your rights. For legal advice, call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: , , , ,


Tuesday, December 29, 2009

  Manufacturers Knew Toy Was Dangerous

Last week, I wrote about the importance of recognizing dangerous toys and applying common sense when choosing your children’s toys. I mentioned then a boy in Texas who died when he swallowed a flexible dart.

It is important to understand that this is not an isolated danger. When poor toy design undermines parents’ honest attempts to protect their children from hazards, the youngest, most defenseless children are often the ones in danger.

In 2005, Penny Sweet bought her ten year old son two boxes of Magnetix toys for his birthday. Magnetix are a type of building kit, where plastic pieces can be held together by powerful magnets. They are a choking hazard.

Sweet’s younger son, Kenny, was not allowed to be in the room when his older siblings played with the Megnetix. He was less than two years old, and his parents realized that the Magnetix toys were not suited for him.

What they did not expect was that the plastic building pieces might break, spilling tiny, powerful magnets and leaving them hidden in the carpet. There, they waited unnoticed until the toddler found them and swallowed them.

Kenny became ill not long after swallowing the magnets. At first, his parents thought he might have caught a stomach bug. They were concerned, but they did not realize at the time that the magnets had become attached within the child’s intestines, cutting off the circulation of blood. The lack of circulation to parts of Kenny’s lower intestine caused the tissue to die, and allowed gangrene to set in. Kenny died during the night as a result of these unseen injuries.

The injury that killed Kenny was comparable to a gunshot or stab wound.

The Sweet family filed a complaint with the Consumer Product Safety Commission, which led to the toy’s manufacturer, Mega Bloks, released a statement in which they claimed to have no knowledge of other such occurrences with their Magnetix product. This statement, however, was a lie.

The truth was, Mega Bloks was aware of several complains that the magnets within this toy could fall out of their plastic casing, and there had already been at least one incidents where another child was dangerously injured as a result of swallowing them.

Even after Kenny’s death, the Mega Bloks company left millions of the toy sets on the shelves for months, before finally voluntarily recalling them in March of 2006. By the time of the recall, the CPSC had reports of 34 injuries to children, nearly half of which had occurred after Kenny Sweet’s death.

The sad fact is that many companies cannot be trusted to keep the best interests of their consumers in mind, and even careful parents cannot prepare or avoid every dangerous situation. By remembering these dangers, parents can keep themselves better informed to protect their children.

If you or someone you love has been injured as the result of a faulty product, it is important to talk to an experienced lawyer as soon as possible. Call (404) 531-9700 to schedule your free consultation at MLN Law.

Labels: ,


Friday, December 25, 2009

  Beware Hazardous Toys this Christmas

Christmas is a special time of year for children and their parents. While the season is one of joy for many, most adults’ enjoyment of Christmas simply cannot compare to the excitement of children in the face of lights, cookies, music and – of course – presents.

And many parents experience their own kind of joy when they watch their children tear into presents or throwing themselves into playing with their new toys.

However, inside some of those brightly wrapped boxes and under those bows, heartbreak can sometimes lurk.

Every year, toys and other children’s products are recalled due to toxicity, unsafe design, choking hazards and more. This year when buying presents for the children in your life, be sure that the gifts you give are age appropriate and safe.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission offers a page on their website listing hazardous toy recalls, which is a good resource for any concerned parent. Also, local news programs often run stories about potentially dangerous toys. The internet is a vast and valuable tool for those who know how to use it.

Recently recalled toys include a toy dart gun set by OKK Trading which led to an asphyxiated child after it became lodged in the child’s throat, a toy truck set called Super Rigs Play Sets which violated lead paint standards, and the Evenflo ExerSaucer® 1-2-3 Tea for Me™ Activity Learning Centers, which was recalled because of choking hazards.

The OKK Trading dart gun has already caused the death of one 8 year old boy in Texas, when he was chewing on it and inadvertently inhaled and swallowed it.

Evenflo ExerSaucer® 1-2-3 Tea for Me™ has not yet caused any reported injuries, but there have been 11 reports of pieces detaching and becoming dangerous choking hazards.

Despite recalls, dangerous toys still often make it onto shelves, and in many cases the manufacturers are well aware of the product’s flaws. A parent cannot trust these companies to look out for the best interests of their children.

The CPSC also offers some advice on toy safety. This sort of advice is useful and available all year, but in this time of giving, it becomes especially relevant.

• Choose toys carefully, respecting the child’s age, interests and skill levels.

• Look for quality design and construction in toys for children of all ages.

• Make sure that all instructions and directions are clear, both to you and your children.

• Discard of plastic and other dangerous packaging immediately.

• Read labels – including age recommendations, warnings and safety labels, and whether or not fabric or dolls are made of washable or hygienic materials.

• Be aware that not all toys are for all children; keep toys for older children out of reach of younger children.

• Toys for infants such as rattles should always be large enough that swallowing them is impossible.

With responsible action, everyone can make this Christmas a safe one for the children who enjoy it.

If your child has been injured as the result of a faulty product, contact a Georgia accident lawyer as soon as possible. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule your free consultation.

Labels: , , ,


Tuesday, December 15, 2009

  CPSC Recalls 50 Million Roman Shades and Roll-up Blinds

Today the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and the Window Covering Safety Council (WCSC) announced a voluntary recall to repair all Roman shades and roll-up blinds due to the risk of strangulation for young children. Roman shades or Roman blinds are made of soft fabric that pleats together when raised. The recall involves approximately 50 million shades and blinds. This is a product recall of historic proportions. Approximately 5 million Roman shades and 3 million roll-up blinds are sold each year.

In regard to Roman shades, the CPSC has received reports of 5 deaths and 16 near-strangulations since 2006. In regard to roll-up blinds, the CPSC has received reports of 3 deaths since 2001. A strangulation can occur with Roman shades if a child places his or her neck between the cord and fabric or if a child wraps the cord around his or her neck. Child strangulations may occur with roll-up blinds if the child’s neck becomes entangled in a cord loop or between the lifting loop and roll-up material.

“Over the past 15 years, CPSC has been investigating window covering hazards and working with the WCSC to ensure the safety of window coverings. We commend the WCSC for providing consumers with repair kits that make window coverings safe and look forward to future steps to eliminate these hazards,” said CPSC Chair Inez Tenenbaum.

The CPSC and the WCSC has worked together to investigate window covering hazards and ensure the safety of all window coverings. In 1994, the CPSC and WCSC announced recalls to repair strangulation hazards posed by horizontal blinds with pull cords and cord loops. As a result of continued CPSC investigations, the window covering industry has changed products and now offers free repair kits for horizontal blinds and other window coverings. Earlier this year the CPSC issued a safety alert to warn parents about the strangulation hazards associated with window coverings.

If you have Roman shades or roll-up blinds in your home, and if children ever visit your home, you should contact the WCSC immediately by visiting windowcoverings.org or by calling 1-800-506-4636. The WCSC will supply a free repair kit.

The CPSC released the following guidelines for parents and caregivers to prevent child strangulation in window coverings:

Examine all shades and blinds in the home. Make sure there are no accessible cords on the front, side, or back of the product. CPSC and the WCSC recommend the use of cordless window coverings in all homes where children live or visit.

Do not place cribs, beds, and furniture close to the windows because children can climb on them and gain access to the cords.

Make loose cords inaccessible.

If the window shade has looped bead chains or nylon cords, install tension devices to keep the cord taut.


If you or a family member have been injured by a defective product or a recalled product, contact a Georgia personal injury attorney as soon as possible. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: ,


Friday, December 11, 2009

  George W. Bush Wore a Defective Brand of Bulletproof Vest? And Manufacturers Knew

Tony Zeppetella was twenty-seven years old in June of 2003. He was a California police officer and the proud father of a six month old son named Jakob. The man, described in two sentences, sounds like the image of American potential – young, starting his family and pursuing his career in law enforcement.

But that month, Zeppetella would be shot during a routine traffic stop. A gang member with a stolen hand gun shot him in the chest as he approached the window, severing an artery in his chest. Zeppetella was able to return fire, but lost his life as a result of his injury.

This story is saddening, but certain details change the tone from unfortunate but a hazard of his job to horrifyingly reprehensible. First, there is the fact that Zeppetella was wearing a bulletproof vest at the time. And second, there is that the vest’s manufacturer, Second Chance Body Armor, had known for years that their products were defective, and had taken no action to warn or protect their consumers.

As early as 1998, executives at Second Chance Body Armor knew that the Zylon material they used in their vest was prone to degradation which could render the supposedly durable armor penetrable. The Zylon, which was supposed to be strong enough to stop a bullet, was known to be untrustworthy.

In a memo written in 2001, one Second Chance executive recommended that the company take immediate action to notify their customers of the degradation problems with the vest – a memo written not only before Zeppetella died, but before his defective vest was even manufactured. In this memo, he argued that “lives and our credibility are at stake.”

However by the next year, no action had yet been taken, and in another memo company president, Richard Davis outlined potential courses of action as he saw them. This outline included, “operating as though nothing is wrong until one of our customers is killed or wounded.” This “option,” as Second Chance put it, guaranteed that someone would injured, potentially fatally, eventually.

Second Chance did not warn its customers until September of 2003, when they recalled some 130,000 of their bulletproof vests. This number did not represent all of their Zylon products on the market, and in 2005 they recalled another 98,000. They company argued that they could simply not afford to replace all of their Zylon products, leaving many still in circulation. One has to wonder if at how Second Chance executives valued the lives of the young men and women who relied on their vests for protection as they protected and served.

In the years between learning of Zylon’s deficiencies and the recall of the Zylon body armor, hundreds of thousands of Second Chance Body Armor’s vests were sold both to law enforcement officers and military personnel. They were even worn by former president George W. Bush.

If you or someone you know has been injured because of a bad product, it is essential to find a skilled attorney and protect your own health and rights as soon as possible. Contact an experienced Atlanta personal injury attorney. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 and schedule a free consultation.

Labels: , ,


Wednesday, December 2, 2009

  Federal Study Validates Corrosion Problems Caused by Defective Chinese Drywall

Last week the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) confirmed that there is a link between imported Chinese drywall and problems of accelerated corrosion of metals in homes that contain the defective drywall.

Federal researchers tested 51 homes in Florida, Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Virginia. Though no Georgia homes were tested, some homes in Georgia reportedly contain the defective Chinese drywall. The federal researchers found “a strong association between the problem drywall, the hydrogen sulfide levels in homes with that drywall, and corrosion in those homes.”

Hydrogen sulfide not only smells horrible (like rotten eggs) but it can also caused metals to corrode and turn black. The hydrogen sulfide in Chinese drywall has caused problems with copper parts in air conditioning units as well as electrical wires and other metal substances. The contaminated Chinese drywall has also been linked to headaches, nosebleeds, and respiratory problems.

Until last week, no agency had officially linked corrosion problems to the contaminated drywall. The CPSC continues to investigate the health problems associated with the defective drywall. The report from the CPSC stated that chemicals found in contaminated homes were at levels lower than what might be expected to cause irritation, but these chemicals could cause symptoms when they combine with other substances. The CPSC stressed that not all Chinese drywall is contaminated.

“Not all drywall is alike,” said Jack McCarthy of Environmental Health and Engineering, the firm that conducted the tests for the CPSC. “Not all Chinese drywall is alike. It depends on what it’s made of - not the country it came from.”

The CPSC has received over 2,000 complaints about defective drywall from homeowners in 32 states, including Georgia. The homeowners believe that the drywall is causing health problems and / or the corrosion of metal. The majority of homeowners who have complained are from Florida.

According to previous estimates, as many as 100,000 homes may be affected by the defective drywall, but CPSC spokesman Scott Wolfson said that the problem probably isn’t that widespread.

So far, the CPSC has spent nearly $3.5 million on its investigation of Chinese drywall. The agency is now moving into the next phase of the investigation, in which they will work on ways to identify problem drywall and treat contaminated homes.

“I’m still disappointed the government is taking too long to establish whether there’s a link between drywall, corrosion, and health problems,” said Sen. Bill Nelson, D-FL. He is not happy with CPSC efforts thus far.

As for the affected homeowners, many of them had to move out of their new homes but keep paying the mortgage on top of rent. Many homeowners are pursuing lawsuits against foreign drywall manufacturers and hoping that they will soon get some type of financial help from the federal government or through the courts. However, the Chinese drywall lawsuits may take years to resolve.

If you suspect that your may contain defective drywall, or if you’ve experienced injuries or health problems due to other defective products, contact a Georgia personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. You may be entitled to recovery. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels:


Tuesday, December 1, 2009

  Ortho Evra Birth Control Patch More Dangerous than Pill, and They Knew

Stephanie Rosfeld was a twenty-five year old mother, a volleyball coach at the University of Cincinnati, a healthy, active young woman just returning from maternity leave, and among the fifty or more women who died as a result of using Johnson & Johnson’s birth control patch, Ortho Evra. No one who knew her could have predicted it, but executives at Johnson & Johnson probably could.

How could they have seen this tragedy coming? Because even before the FDA approved Ortho Evra, Johnson & Johnson knew that the patch’s method of delivering hormones to the bloodstream was giving women a much higher dose of estrogen than low dose birth control pills do.

Estrogen, as many people know, is the primary female sex hormone. Many women take estrogen supplements both as a form of oral contraception – often paired with progesterone – or in hormone replacement therapies. What fewer people know is that higher levels of estrogen increase the likelihood of blood clots and stroke, even in healthy women.

Over the past several years a growing body of evidence has connected female hormonal birth control to these increased risks of heart attack and stroke. These risks are higher in women over thirty-five, smokers, and those with other cardiovascular risks like high blood pressure.

Johnson & Johnson knew all this, and new from their own research that Ortho Evra carried too high of a risk for blood clots, and rather than halting its production, they hid the results. In fact, the company misreported their results by 40 percent.

The FDA were troubled when they reviewed the results of Johnson & Johnson’s clinical trials because there seemed to be troubling discrepancies in the research. However not knowing that the results had been willfully doctored to misrepresent the safety of the drug, they approved it for use in 2001.

Once Ortho Evra was on the market, Johnson & Johnson’s dishonesty only continued. The company avoided further research, including refusing to conduct comparison trials against the oral contraception, Ortho Cyclen. Internal memos sent within the company reveal that the reason for this refusal was “too high a chance that study may not produce a positive result for Evra” and fear that “risk that Ortho Evra may be the same or worse than Ortho Cyclen.”

Between 2002 and 2006, the FDA received reports of fifty deaths which were linked to the use of the Ortho Evra patch. Yet despite Johnson & Johnson having paid out over $68 million in settlements with hundreds of women who suffered from the increased averse side effects of this drug, Ortho Evra is still sold in the United States without even a black box warning.

If you or someone you know has been injured because of a bad product, it is essential to find a skilled attorney and protect your own health and rights as soon as possible. Contact an experienced Atlanta personal injury attorney, call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 and schedule a free consultation.

Labels: ,


Thursday, November 26, 2009

  CPSC Recalls 2 Million Stork Craft Cribs

Earlier this week the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced the recall of approximately 2.1 million drop-side cribs sold under the Stork Craft and Fisher-Price brand names. They were recalled after reports of the drop side separating from the crib. This poses a risk of entrapment and suffocation for infants.

This is the largest crib recall in the history of the U.S. It includes 2 million Stork Craft drop side cribs and 147,000 Fisher-Price drop side cribs manufactured by Stork Craft Manufacturing.

The recalled cribs were sold between January 1993 and October 2009. Sale prices were between $100 and $400. They were sold by some major U.S. retailers including Wal-Mart, Sears, Kmart, JC Penney, USA Baby, BJ’s Wholsesale Club, Meijer, Amazon.com, Babiesrus.com, Costco.com, Walmart.com, and Target.com.

The CPSC and Health Canada have received 100 reports where the drop side of the crib detached (67 in the U.S. and 43 in Canada). Children fell from the cribs in 20 of these cases. In 15 of the reported cases, infants were entrapped. If the drop side detaches, it can trap the infant between the crib and the mattress. There have been four reports of infants suffocating in the defective cribs. All of the infants who suffocated were 9 months or younger.

Parents who have a Stork Craft crib should immediately stop using the crib and contact Stork Craft for a free repair kit. The repair kit will transform the crib from a drop-side crib to a fixed side crib. This will eliminate the risk of detachment.

All Stork Craft drop side cribs that use a plastic trigger and one-hand drop side are included in the recall. Some have “storkcraft baby” or “storkling” on them. The Fisher-Price cribs display the Fisher-Price logo.

In recent years, several different brands of drop-side cribs have been recalled, but this is by far the largest crib recall. It is also the second recall of Stork Craft cribs this year. In January, a million Stork Craft cribs were recalled because of defective metal support brackets.

When you think about it, a drop-side crib design is not a very good idea. The design is inherently unstable. In addition, many families reuse cribs with different infants. The more a drop-side crib is reused, the greater the chance that it will break down. These cribs are generally made with inexpensive parts that are not very durable. Several manufacturers and retailers are moving away from the drop-side crib design. Toys R Us has announced that it is phasing out the design. A safe alternative is the “drop gate” crib, which also provides easy access. Drop gate cribs have gates that fold down rather than sides that slide down. The hinged gates firmly attach to the upper rail of the crib.

If your child has been injured by a defective product, call an experienced Georgia personal injury lawyer immediately. Time is of the essence. If you do not act quickly, you may lose your right to file suit. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: ,




  Tainted Peanuts Distributed, And They Knew

The Food and Drug Administration is tasked with protecting the safety of the American people by ensuring the quality and efficiency of drugs, biological and medical devices, cosmetics, and perhaps most importantly, our food supply. It does this through offices throughout the country where they perform inspections and respond to complaints.

However, the FDA lacks the resources to regularly inspect food plants. Typically, the organization will send inspectors to plants only every five or ten years. Between FDA inspections, state health inspectors do their best to pick up the responsibility of protecting consumers.

The Peanut Corp. of America (PCA), received acceptable marks on the 2006, 2007 and 2008 inspections of their Blakely, Georgia plant.

Yet in December of 2008, Shirley Almer, a seventy-two year old cancer survivor from Minnesota died of salmonella poisoning. The grandmother who had survived lung cancer and a brain tumor was killed by contaminated peanut butter.

Two months later, an Oregon three year old named Jacob Hurley began suffering from vomiting and bloody diarrhea. His pediatrician encouraged his parents to try to get him to eat again. The child’s parents tried to tempt him with his favorite food: Austin Toasty Crackers with Peanut Butter. Jacob did not recover, because without realizing it, his parents were feeding him more of the source of his problems. After being notified, the Oregon Office of Disease Prevention and Epidemiology tested the Austin Toasty Crackers with Peanut Butter, and found three out of six of the packets tainted with salmonella.

Jacob Hurley took eleven days to recover.

These two examples are among over 700 cases of salmonella, at least 9 of which proved fatal, which were traced back to contaminated peanuts from PCA’s Georgia plant. When investigators finally found the plant, they discovered unsanitary conditions, including cockroaches, leaky roofs, mold and machinery held together by duct tape. This plant, prior to its shut down, had processed 35 million pounds of peanuts a year.

The situation goes from tragic to horrifying, however. As investigations continued, the FDA found that PCA executives knew of the contamination. The PCA’s own internal testing had found the presence of salmonella on twelve separate occasions. Despite knowing this, PCA’s decision was to distribute the peanuts and approach another lab to conduct their internal health audits. This new lab gave plants a month’s advance warning of inspections, and awarded “superior” or excellent ratings to 98 percent of its clients.

Investigators later identified yet another problem plant, this one in Plainview, Texas. Conditions at the Texas plant included rodents and rodent excrement, as well as bird feathers found in a crawl space from which the ventilation system pulled air. Samples from this plant also tested positive for salmonella, and the PCA was forced to shut down this plant as well.

It may seem impossible and frightening that for two years, from 2006 to 2008, a company was able to distribute dangerously contaminated food – peanuts which ended up in numerous diverse products. Oscar Garrison, Georgia’s assistant agricultural commissioner, defended the state’s work, saying that it’s difficult for health inspectors to find problems when a company is determined to break the law.

Labels: , ,


Thursday, November 19, 2009

  Firestone Tires Did Nothing About Their Dangerous Product

In March of 2000, Donna Bailey was on her way to a climbing trip in Texas with two of her friends. It sounds like it should be a cheerful story. Unfortunately, that was not to be. Bailey, a forty-six year old mother of two, was left paralyzed from the neck down when the Firestone tires on the Ford Explorer she was driving began to separate, causing the SUV to roll over.

Not everyone who has experienced this terrifying phenomenon has survived. 271 people died in accidents involving Firestone’s tires on Ford Explorers before their eventual 2000 recall. Many more, like Bailey, were seriously injured.

It was the largest tire recall in history.

Internal documentation eventually showed that both Ford and Firestone were well aware of the separation problem, and the rollovers that resulted from it, as early as 1997. Firestone had already received complaints from consumers who had purchased the Ford vehicle with their tires – a hundred times more complaints than they normally received for their products. The fact that there was a major problem with these tires was evident.

Later, Firestone employees would reveal that they punctured bubbles in the tire’s rubber to help disguise imperfections. Inspection and regulation of the finished tires was nonexistent.

At least three years after the company initially learned of the dangerous flaws in their product, in May of 2000, an investigation was finally opened by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. NHTSA’s concern was primarily over the issue of tread separation.

Tread separation occurs when the tread peels off the tire, often followed by the tire disintegrating. If this happened at speed, then it is likely to lead to a rollover. Vehicle rollovers are incredibly dangerous, and have a higher fatality rate than other kinds of accidents. Under normal circumstances, rollovers account for only about 3% of accidents, but 33% of fatalities – about a third of all fatalities. They are especially dangerous if drivers are not wearing their safety belts, but many drivers, like Donna Bailey, are seriously injured in rollovers despite proper safety belt use.

Under this attention, Firestone recalled 6.5 million tires. This would seem like a responsible move on the part of Firestone, finally, but the NHTSA warned the company of over a million tires with potentially worse faults than the recalled units. Firestone refused to expand the recall.

Firestone executives would go on to defend their decision against taking further action by saying, “We’ve got such a high volume of tires that looking for the root cause of the problem is like looking for a needle in a haystack.”

The NHTSA’s maximum fine of $925,000 was not enough to deter Firestone from inaction.

Donna Bailey sought justice through the civil court system, and was able to receive not only a monetary settlement, but also apologies from Firestone executives. Internal documents from Firestone were also released as part of the settlement.

If you have been injured in a car accident or due to a case of product liability, such as this one, then you need the services of a skilled attorney. If you have any questions, call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: , ,


Tuesday, November 17, 2009

  Bad Medical Devices Lead to Deaths, Maker Knew and Did Nothing

I have already pointed out this pamphlet as a valuable resource for consumers, however what many of these stories really highlight is how difficult it can be to know when a product is dangerous. These companies often deliberately hide what they know about their dangerous products. Further, in the wake of last week's massive Maclaren stroller recall, discussing faulty and dangerous products is more timely than ever.

In 2002, the medical manufacturer Guidant knew that their heart defibrillators were faulty. Due to a bad seal, fluid could penetrate the devices and cause short circuits. When the time came for the defibrillator to serve its purpose and deliver a shock to an irregularly beating heart, the Guidant defibrillator would do nothing.

Guidant new of this problem and corrected it, however, the companies executives also decided that it was most cost effective to continue to sell the defective devices which they still had in their inventory. 37,000 of these defibrillators were sold by Guidant after they were aware of the flaw and the product was redesigned.

It was not until 2005 that Guidant finally issued a warning about its product. Prior to that, the company’s executives made no effort to warn doctors or regulators of dangers with this device.

But what happened in 2005 which changed this? As is unfortunately often the case in situations where a device people rely on to protect their lives is untrustworthy: tragedy.

In the spring of 2005, Joshua Oukrop went for a bike ride with his girlfriend on the canyon trails near Moab, Utah. Joshua was 21 years old and enjoying his spring break, and he suffered from a genetic heart disease. He had taken steps to control his disease, among them having a Guidant defibrillator surgically implanted. His defibrillator failed to work when it was needed, and Joshua died.

In the months after Joshua Oukrop’s death, it became clear that it was not a one of a kind malfunction. Representatives from Guidant met with his doctor, Barry Maron, and revealed that they were aware of at least twenty-five other instances where the same model of defibrillator had short circuited. They insisted that the likelihood of the devices malfunctioning was small. The company argued that the risks of surgery to replace the defibrillators.

Dr. Maron notified the media, fearing that it would be only a matter of time before someone else died as a result of the company’s practices.

The ensuing investigations by the FDA and the media began to uncover just what Guidant knew of their products and when they knew it. In May 2005, The New York Times was preparing to print a front page article about how Guidant had neglected the health of their customers, and finally they began warning doctors of the dangers of the device. They still balked to admit that their defibrillators should be replaced.

After a 2006 inquiry by the Department of Justice, Guidant offered to cover the cost of replacement defibrillators, but declined to cover the cost of the surgery to replace them.

If you have been injured by a defective product contact an experienced Georgia personal injury lawyer. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: ,


Friday, November 13, 2009

  Georgia Legislation Targets Contaminated Food Producers

Fox Atlanta reports that Georgia state legislation could lead to the felony prosecution of food processors responsible for contaminated food products. The bill is being prepared a year after the deadly salmonella outbreak that stemmed from a Blakely, Georgia peanut processing plant. Nine people died in the outbreak, and hundreds became ill.

Georgia Representative Kevin Levitas will introduce the new food safety bill, which will call for felony punishment of one to 20 years for knowingly releasing contaminated food products that result in injury or death. The bill would also require companies to maintain better written records of food safety plans at processing plants.

“It sends out a strong message that Georgia stands for a high standard and we won't tolerate anybody who won't maintain those high standards. If you don't want to maintain them, then don't process food and don't grow it in the state of Georgia," said Rep. Levitas.

He plans to pre-file his bill at the state capitol. The Georgia General Assembly goes into session in January. While state legislation is being considered, some are still waiting for possible federal prosecution in the case.

"We certainly don't need to be spending state resources to duplicate what they're doing on the federal level. If the feds decide, hey we're not interested in doing this, that's the time for us to step in," Levitas said.

The federal government may indeed step in. Just last week the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that victims of the Salmonella outbreak are upset that there haven’t been any prosecutions yet, even thought FDA inspectors found roaches, mold, and a leaky roof.

Evidence shows that the head of the Peanut Corp. of America wrote emails to “turn them loose” after employees reported salmonella in the products. He wrote that his workers “desperately at least need to turn the raw peanuts on our floor into money.”

Still, federal prosecutors have not said whether or not Peanut Corp. of American executives will be facing charges.

“I thought prosecutions were a no-brainer,” said Lou Tousignant, whose father died from salmonella poisoning after eating contaminated peanut butter. “It seems like it’s been forgotten. That’s kind of how the country ebbs and flows. It’s in the news for a while, then everything quiets down.”

Creighton Magid, a products liability attorney in Washington, agreed with Tousignant: “It does surprise me.”

The victims are eager for action, reports AJC.

Gabrielle Meunier, whose 7-year-old son Christopher was hospitalized for a week after he was poisoned by salmonella, said, "The time is now. If the company's executives are spared prosecution, what does that say to the American public?"

GF “Pete” Peterman, the acting U.S. Attorney for the district including the peanut plant, did not comment to AJC reporters.

If the federal government does not take action, hopefully the state will take steps to ensure that food manufacturers will be properly punished for knowingly releasing tainted food to the public.

Have you been seriously injured by a contaminated or defective product? If so, contact an experienced Georgia personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, November 11, 2009

  NHTSA May Recall Jeep Grand Cherokee due to Defective Fuel Tank

Motor Trend reports that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) may begin an investigation into a fuel tank defect in 1993 to 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokees. The Center for Auto Safety, a consumer advocacy group, says that more than 250 people have died in fires in accidents involving the defective fuel tank.

Clarence Ditlow, executive director of the Center for Auto Safety Clarence Ditlow signed a petition which reads, “The fuel tank of the Grand Cherokee is plastic and extends below the rear bumper so there is nothing to protect the tank from a direct hit in a rollover or by a vehicle with a low front profile or one lowered by pre-impact braking.”

NHTSA claims that only one death and nine injuries have been related to fuel fires in reported accidents. However, the Center for Auto Safety says that NHTSA files show that between 1992 and 1998 there were 172 Jeep Grand Cherokee crashes involving fires that caused 254 deaths.

The fuel tank is not properly shielded from impact, and the fuel filler neck can be ripped off during an accident and cause a fuel leak, according to the Center for Auto Safety.

Chrysler released a statement which read: “Chrysler group is confident that a study which considered all factors in all collisions - including rear collisions with fire - would show that the 1993 - 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokees perform as well as or better than other vehicles in their class. The 1993 - 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee meets or exceeds all applicable federal safety standards and has an excellent safety record.”

Then why did the automaker relocate and shield the fuel tank in 2005? This fact strengthens the argument from the Center for Auto Safety. Since the tank was relocated and shielded, there has only been one crash involving a fatal fire, according to the Center for Auto Safety.

The Center for Auto Safety filed the petition for an investigation by the NHTSA in October. If NHTSA begins an investigation, it could affect approximately 3 million Jeep Grand Cherokees. The investigation, if opened, could take years before a ruling is issued on a potential recall.

I don’t understand why automakers don’t place more importance on protecting the fuel tank. After all, gasoline is an explosive substance. For years, GM trucks were manufactured with gas tanks on the side of the truck, outside of the frame rails with no protection. In some cars, including the Ford Crown Victoria, the fuel tank is located behind the rear axle. This can result in terrible fires in rear collision accidents.

If you or a loved one have been injured in a car wreck due to a potentially defective part or reckless behavior on the part of another driver, contact an experienced Atlanta auto wreck attorney as soon as possible. An attorney can advise your of your legal rights and help you get the compensation you deserve. Contact MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: ,


Tuesday, November 10, 2009

  A Million Maclaren Strollers Recalled due to Amputation Hazard



Yesterday the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a recall of approximately one million Maclaren strollers that were sold between 1999 until the time of the recall. According to TIME magazine, this brand of strollers is popular among the young-urban-professional demographic. The recalled Maclaren strollers are light and upscale, ranging from $100 to $360.

Several different models of Maclaren strollers were recalled The CPSC warns consumers to stop using any single or double umbrella strollers with the word “Maclaren” written on them. At least 12 children have had their fingers amputated after placing them in the hinge where the stroller folds.

“This is a very serious hazard. We know child behavior. We know kids like to explore and sometimes put their fingers in places where they shouldn’t be. But finger amputations that result from using a product that parents expect to be safe is unacceptable,” said Scott Wilson, spokesperson for the CPSC.

Maclaren is offering free hinge covers to protect children’s fingers. You can order the hinge covers from the Maclaren USA website at maclaren.us/recal - but be warned that the site has been slow and overloaded lately because it has been getting so much web traffic.

Charlotte Addison of Maclaren said, “We are working to address the issue. We didn’t anticipate getting the volume that we got today.

You may also call 1-877-688-2326. Again, it may be difficult to get through.

The blogosphere is all atwitter about this recall. One blogger at The Mother Load wrote, “Fingertip amputation? And they had to get to TWELVE cases before they issued a recall?” The search term “Macleren fingertip amputation” is already showing over 37,000 results on Google. Word spreads fast online - and that’s a good thing when it comes to child safety!

Indeed, Pete Blackshaw, a consultant for Nielson Online, reports that new mothers are three times more likely than others to use social media and start blogs. Blackshaw said, “Given the higher order of sensitivity, parents are much more diligent. They want to talk to friends, family and even strangers about their decisions. They’ll go the extra distance.” And they’ll also go the extra distance to warn other parents about dangerous products.

Maclaren USA, a 42-year-old brand originating in Great Britain, has been struggling to keep up with consumer demand for information about the recalled products. It has been difficult to access their website as well as their toll-free number, and TIME reports that the Maclaren Twitter account linked to pages that didn’t exist. A Maclaren Facebook page, however, instructs customers to email their name, address, phone number, stroller model, and stroller VIN number to sales@maclarenbaby.com.

It’s heartening to see such a viral online response to a child safety issue. The Internet continues to take on a greater role in the prevention of child injuries and personal injuries. I’m glad to be a small part of that.

If your child has been injured by a defective product, contact a Georgia personal injury lawyer as soon as possible to ask about your legal rights. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: , ,




  Faulty Products Injure Consumers, and They Knew

Every year, untold numbers of Americans suffer from complications due to toxic or poorly designed products. While it sounds like a conspiracy theory, many corporations knowingly distribute flawed products when the financial motivation is great enough. The ethical implications have often proven insufficient to keep tainted medications, contaminated food and dangerous technology from reaching the public.

For a careful consumer, the internet provides a number of resources which can prove useful to understanding product risks. For example, The American Association for Justice provides a pamphlet which outlines a number of incidents where executives were well aware of the risks inherit in their products, and yet failed to act in any way to protect their customers.

Take the example of Propulsid, a prescription heartburn medication produced by Johnson & Johnson. Between 1993 and 1998, Johnson and Johnson made over a billion dollars on this product. By early 1995, it was already apparent that this drug was related to severe heart problems in some patients, and that it posed a particular risk to children. The Food and Drug Administration received growing numbers of reports of serious heart problems within the eighteen months hat followed. Federal regulators refused to clear the drug for pediatric sales – a warning which was not made public.

Johnson & Johnson agreed not to market Propulsid to children because of the increased chance of serious side effects, however they side stepped this agreement under the guise of educational efforts. These so-called educational efforts were, in fact, nothing more than a method of directing their dangerous product at the pediatric market. Ninety percent of the companies sales of cherry flavored Propulsid went to children, a fact of which documentation would show executives were well aware.

Lawsuits on behalf of injured patients would also show that Johnson & Johnson also avoided doing studies recommended by federal regulators, and that they suppressed the results of other studies which may have warned physicians of the dangers of their drug.

Gage Stevens was a three month old admitted to Pittsburg Children’s hospital with heartburn, diarrhea, frequent crying and vomiting. A specialist there saw him and recommended Propulsid for his condition. Gage died six months later of a heart arrhythmia. He was not alone. Before Johnson & Johnson finally removed Propulsid from the market in 2000, after two years of rejecting proposed changes to the product’s warnings and marketing, three hundred people had died of Propulsid. Sixteen thousand were injured.

Among one of the Johnson & Johnson’s executives’ notes was written, “Do we want to stand in front of the world and admit we were never able to prove efficiency!”

In 2000, the FDA was no longer able to ignore the consequences of Propulsid’s use. Rather than addressing the mounting safety concerns surrounding the drug, Johnson & Johnson announced that they would no longer be selling Propulsid.

If you or a loved one has been injured by any prescription drug, contact an experienced Atlanta personal injury attorney as soon as possible. Call MLN Law at 404-531-9700 to schedule a free consultation.

Labels: ,


Archives

February 2007   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   January 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010  

This page 

is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]